Thorium utilization appears to permit development of an advanced technology involving fuel handling, processing, and refabricating on an economic basis. Based on U. S. cost rules, countercurrent fueling, and a throw-away cycle, heavy-water reactors fueled with Th-U/sup 235/ had fuel costs as low as natural-uranium-fueled systems. The spent fuel from the thorium system contained four times as much fissionable fuel as that from the natural-uranium system, and so processing costs and/or refabrication costs for the thorium fuel could be relatively high and still be economical. With fuel processing, U. S. processing charges, and uniform-batch fueling, light-water reactors fueled with Th-U/sup …
continued below
We've identified this
report
as a primary source within our collections. Researchers, educators, and students may find this report useful in their work.
Provided By
UNT Libraries Government Documents Department
Serving as both a federal and a state depository library, the UNT Libraries Government Documents Department maintains millions of items in a variety of formats. The department is a member of the FDLP Content Partnerships Program and an Affiliated Archive of the National Archives.
Added Title:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory Report CF-61-6-83
Description
Thorium utilization appears to permit development of an advanced technology involving fuel handling, processing, and refabricating on an economic basis. Based on U. S. cost rules, countercurrent fueling, and a throw-away cycle, heavy-water reactors fueled with Th-U/sup 235/ had fuel costs as low as natural-uranium-fueled systems. The spent fuel from the thorium system contained four times as much fissionable fuel as that from the natural-uranium system, and so processing costs and/or refabrication costs for the thorium fuel could be relatively high and still be economical. With fuel processing, U. S. processing charges, and uniform-batch fueling, light-water reactors fueled with Th-U/sup 235/ had lower fuel costs than slightly-enriched-uranium reactors; for higher neutron- economy systems, the uranium reactors had lower fuel costs in the initial uniform batch cycle, but recycle of thorium fuel was generally more economic than recycle of uranium fuel. Based on the existence of an economic, advanced technology, calculated fuel-cycle costs for thorium-breeder reactors (including special-materials inventory charges) were less than 1 mill/kwh. The aqueous- homogeneous breeder reactor studied bad a fuel cost of about 0.9 mill/kwh at a fuel yield of 7% per year, while a molten-salt-breeder reactor had a fuel cost of about 0.6 mill/kwh at a fuel yield of 1% per year. (auth)
This report is part of the following collections of related materials.
TRAIL Microcard Collection
Imaged from microcard, these technical reports describe research performed for U.S. government agencies from the 1930s to the 1960s. The reports were provided by the Technical Report Archive and Image Library (TRAIL).
The Technical Report Archive & Image Library (TRAIL) identifies, acquires, catalogs, digitizes and provides unrestricted access to U.S. government agency technical reports. The mission of TRAIL is to ensure preservation, discoverability, and persistent open access to government technical publications regardless of form or format.
Kasten, Paul R.; Alexander, L. G.; Carlsmith, R. & Van Winkle, R.Economics of Thorium Fuel Cycles,
report,
June 22, 1961;
Washington D.C..
(https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1241237/:
accessed March 16, 2026),
University of North Texas Libraries, UNT Digital Library, https://digital.library.unt.edu;
crediting UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.