A comparison of surface topography characterization technologies for use in comparing spent bullet and cartridge case signatures Page: 4 of 73
This report is part of the collection entitled: Office of Scientific & Technical Information Technical Reports and was provided to Digital Library by the UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
Clever, novel engineering solutions resulting in a more cost-effective system,
or a closer fit to the "ideal system," could result in a reordering of the
short list when actual technical proposals are evaluated. Therefore, it is
recommended that a Request for Proposal not be limited to only the highest
ranked technology, but include all six technologies in the short list.
, i 1] 1 1
Here’s what’s next.
This report can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Report.
Batishko, C.R.; Hickman, B.J. & Cuta, F.M. A comparison of surface topography characterization technologies for use in comparing spent bullet and cartridge case signatures, report, November 1, 1992; Richland, Washington. (https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1183436/m1/4/: accessed April 23, 2019), University of North Texas Libraries, Digital Library, https://digital.library.unt.edu; crediting UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.