Top-down versus bottom-up processing of influence diagrams in probabilistic analysis

Thumbnail image of item number 1 in: 'Top-down versus bottom-up processing of influence diagrams in probabilistic analysis'.
Thumbnail image of item number 2 in: 'Top-down versus bottom-up processing of influence diagrams in probabilistic analysis'.
Thumbnail image of item number 3 in: 'Top-down versus bottom-up processing of influence diagrams in probabilistic analysis'.
Thumbnail image of item number 4 in: 'Top-down versus bottom-up processing of influence diagrams in probabilistic analysis'.
Showing 1-4 of 6 pages in this article.

PDF Version Also Available for Download.

Description

Recent work by Phillips et al., and Selby et al., has shown that influence diagram methodology can be a useful analytical tool in reactor safety studies. An influence diagram is a graphical representation of probabilistic dependence within a system or event sequence. Bayesian statistics are employed to transform the relationships depicted in the influence diagram into the correct expression for a desired marginal probability (e.g. the top event). As with fault trees, top-down and bottom-up algorithms have emerged as the dominant methods for quantifying influence diagrams. Purpose of this paper is to demonstrate a potential error in employing the bottom-up ... continued below

Physical Description

Pages: 6

Creation Information

Timmerman, R.D.; Burns, T.J. & Dodds, H.L. Jr. January 1, 1984.

Context

This article is part of the collection entitled: Office of Scientific & Technical Information Technical Reports and was provided by UNT Libraries Government Documents Department to Digital Library, a digital repository hosted by the UNT Libraries. It has been viewed 112 times , with 33 in the last month . More information about this article can be viewed below.

Who

People and organizations associated with either the creation of this article or its content.

Authors

Publishers

Provided By

UNT Libraries Government Documents Department

Serving as both a federal and a state depository library, the UNT Libraries Government Documents Department maintains millions of items in a variety of formats. The department is a member of the FDLP Content Partnerships Program and an Affiliated Archive of the National Archives.

About | Browse this Partner

Contact Us

Corrections Questions

What

Descriptive information to help identify this article. Follow the links below to find similar items on the Digital Library.

Description

Recent work by Phillips et al., and Selby et al., has shown that influence diagram methodology can be a useful analytical tool in reactor safety studies. An influence diagram is a graphical representation of probabilistic dependence within a system or event sequence. Bayesian statistics are employed to transform the relationships depicted in the influence diagram into the correct expression for a desired marginal probability (e.g. the top event). As with fault trees, top-down and bottom-up algorithms have emerged as the dominant methods for quantifying influence diagrams. Purpose of this paper is to demonstrate a potential error in employing the bottom-up algorithm when dealing with interdependencies. In addition, the computing efficiency of both methods is discussed.

Physical Description

Pages: 6

Notes

NTIS, PC A02/MF A01.

Source

  • Joint meeting of the American Nuclear Society and the Atomic Industrial Forum, Washington, DC, USA, 11 Nov 1984

Language

Item Type

Identifier

Unique identifying numbers for this article in the Digital Library or other systems.

  • Other: DE85005381
  • Report No.: CONF-841105-53
  • Grant Number: AC05-84OR21400
  • Office of Scientific & Technical Information Report Number: 6079284
  • Archival Resource Key: ark:/67531/metadc1113235

Collections

This article is part of the following collection of related materials.

Office of Scientific & Technical Information Technical Reports

Reports, articles and other documents harvested from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information.

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI) is the Department of Energy (DOE) office that collects, preserves, and disseminates DOE-sponsored research and development (R&D) results that are the outcomes of R&D projects or other funded activities at DOE labs and facilities nationwide and grantees at universities and other institutions.

About | Browse this Collection

What responsibilities do I have when using this article?

Digital Files

When

Dates and time periods associated with this article.

Creation Date

  • January 1, 1984

Added to The UNT Digital Library

  • Feb. 22, 2018, 7:45 p.m.

Description Last Updated

  • March 26, 2018, 1:14 p.m.

Usage Statistics

When was this article last used?

Yesterday: 1
Past 30 days: 33
Total Uses: 112
More Statistics

Interact With This Article

Here are some suggestions for what to do next.

Start Reading

Thumbnail image of item number 1 in: 'Top-down versus bottom-up processing of influence diagrams in probabilistic analysis'.
Thumbnail image of item number 2 in: 'Top-down versus bottom-up processing of influence diagrams in probabilistic analysis'.
Thumbnail image of item number 3 in: 'Top-down versus bottom-up processing of influence diagrams in probabilistic analysis'.
Thumbnail image of item number 4 in: 'Top-down versus bottom-up processing of influence diagrams in probabilistic analysis'.

PDF Version Also Available for Download.

Citations, Rights, Re-Use

International Image Interoperability Framework

IIF Logo

We support the IIIF Presentation API

Timmerman, R.D.; Burns, T.J. & Dodds, H.L. Jr. Top-down versus bottom-up processing of influence diagrams in probabilistic analysis, article, January 1, 1984; United States. (digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1113235/: accessed December 13, 2018), University of North Texas Libraries, Digital Library, digital.library.unt.edu; crediting UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.