FCC Record, Volume 27, No. 7, Pages 5674 to 6652, May 23 - June 15, 2012 Page: 5,720
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
eo rai 'nm1i 11UnnniflncL Cununu IIIl3nV I U I IL
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, DC 20554
In the Matter of )
Request for Waiver and Review of )
Decision of the )
Universal Service Administrator by
Sprint Nextel Corporation ) File No. SLD-525962
(Anaheim City School District,) )
Anaheim, California) )
Schools and Libraries Universal Service ) CC Docket No. 02-6
Support Mechanism )
Adopted: May 23, 2012 Released: May 23, 2012
By the Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau:
1. Consistent with precedent,' we grant Sprint Nextel Corporation's (Sprint's)2 request on
behalf of the Anaheim City School District (Anaheim City) seeking review of a decision made by the
Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC) under the E-rate program (more formally known as
the schools and libraries universal service support program).' We find that Anaheim City sought mobile
broadband service that was eligible for E-rate funding as Internet access in the applicable funding year.
We deny, however, Sprint's related request for a waiver allowing Anaheim City to correct its application
and seek E-rate funding for Evolution Data Optimized (EVDO) connection cards as internal connections
because we decline to find that connection cards for the mobile broadband service were eligible for
' See. e.g., Requests for Waiver and Review of Decisions of the Universal Service Administrator by Aberdeen School
District 5, et al., Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, File Nos. SLD-525618, et al., CC
Docket No. 02-6, Order, 27 FCC Red 2080 (Wireline Comp. Bur. Feb. 24, 2012) (determining that applicants sought
support for service, products or maintenance that were eligible for E-rate funding based on the Eligible Services
2 See Appeal of Sprint Nextel Corporation (Anaheim City School District, Anaheim CA), to Federal
Communications Commission, Application No. 525962, CC Docket Nos. 02-6 (filed Nov. 9, 2006) (Request for
3 Section 54.719(c) of the Commission's rules provides that any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of
USAC may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R. 54.719(c).
4 End-user equipment is not eligible for E-rate funding and other equipment is not eligible if it is provided in or with
end-user equipment. See, e.g., USAC website, Eligible Services List, Schools and Libraries Support Mechanism For
Fund Year 2006, http:A/!www.usac orgY rcsdocuments/slipdf/ESL archive EligibleSeicesList 041206.pdf, at 25-
43 (last visited May 15, 2012) (2006 ESL) (listing eligible, conditionally eligible, and ineligible internal connections
F dr al Co mmnin nnc mrinmmtccinnC
Here’s what’s next.
This book can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Book.
United States. Federal Communications Commission. FCC Record, Volume 27, No. 7, Pages 5674 to 6652, May 23 - June 15, 2012, book, June 2012; Washington D.C.. (digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc111171/m1/63/: accessed November 23, 2017), University of North Texas Libraries, Digital Library, digital.library.unt.edu; crediting UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.