Accident versus Essence: Investigating the Relationship Among Information Systems Development and Requirements Capabilities and Perceptions of Enterprise Architecture Page: 3
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
relationship leading to several explanations as to its meaning and contributions to
research and practice.
This research contributes to IS development knowledge by providing evidence of
the essential role of requirements in IS development capabilities and in IS development
maturity. Furthermore, contributions to the nascent field of EA research and practice
include key insight into EA maturity, EA implementation success, and the role of IT
professionals in EA teams. Moreover, these results provide a template and research
plan of action to pursue further EA research in exploring EA maturity models and critical
success factors, and the state of practice of EA in organizations.
Here’s what’s next.
This dissertation can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Dissertation.
Salmans, Brian R. Accident versus Essence: Investigating the Relationship Among Information Systems Development and Requirements Capabilities and Perceptions of Enterprise Architecture, dissertation, August 2009; Denton, Texas. (https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc11010/m1/3/: accessed April 25, 2019), University of North Texas Libraries, Digital Library, https://digital.library.unt.edu; .