Oh G-d, A Borderline: Clinical Diagnostics As Fundamental Attribution Error Page: 29
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
.84 on clinical attribution.
Analysis of Hypothesis 2. The hypothesis that there would be a significant interaction
effect of contextual information on CAS scores by diagnosis was investigated using a univariate
ANOVA with diagnosis and context entered into the model as an interaction term. The results of
the ANOVA indicated a non-significant interaction effect, F(2, 81) = 1.43, p = .25, that
graphically (see Figure 1) trends in the hypothesized direction.
Analysis of Hypothesis 3. The hypothesis that there would be a significant simple main
effect of theoretical orientation at the diagnosis level was investigated using a one-way ANOVA
among those presented with a diagnosis. The mean CAS scores by orientation are provided in
Table 3; Levene's test of homogeneity of variances was acceptable, p = .65. No significant effect
of Orientation was observed at the Diagnosis level, F(4, 38) = 2.44, p = .06.
Here’s what’s next.
This thesis can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Thesis.
Schmalz, Jonathan. Oh G-d, A Borderline: Clinical Diagnostics As Fundamental Attribution Error, thesis, December 2011; Denton, Texas. (digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc103389/m1/35/: accessed February 24, 2017), University of North Texas Libraries, Digital Library, digital.library.unt.edu; .