Oh G-d, A Borderline: Clinical Diagnostics As Fundamental Attribution Error Page: 22
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
that the woman has been diagnosed with borderline PD, the other half was not. Clinician self-
reported theoretical orientation was used as a third independent variable.
Hypothesis 1. There would be a significant main effect of diagnosis. Those participants
who were presented with a diagnosis would make significantly more dispositional attributions.
Hypothesis 2. There would be a significant interaction effect between contextual
information and diagnosis. Participants presented with a diagnosis would make greater
dispositional attributions regardless of contextual information.
Hypothesis 3. There would be a significant simple main effect of theoretical orientation.
Participants endorsing psychodynamic and cognitive-behavioral orientations would exhibit
significantly more dispositional attributions than their third wave behavioral, existential,
phenomenological, or humanistic colleagues.
Here’s what’s next.
This thesis can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Thesis.
Schmalz, Jonathan. Oh G-d, A Borderline: Clinical Diagnostics As Fundamental Attribution Error, thesis, December 2011; Denton, Texas. (digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc103389/m1/28/: accessed July 21, 2017), University of North Texas Libraries, Digital Library, digital.library.unt.edu; .