Seismic Performance Evaluation of Novel Cold-Formed Steel Framed Shear Walls Sheathed with Corrugated Steel Sheets Page: 25
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
Table 4.6 - Comparison between Sheet-in Bearing Wall and Sheet-in Shear Wall
Test Aeae AegeInitial
Test Gravity Hold- Average Average Dciiynta
Test label Wall type protocol Peak Disp @ Ductility Drift Stiffness
(M/C) Load down Peak Factor k (lbs/in)
4x8x68x27 - T#1 Bearing Wall M Y N 1186.9 2.58 2.873 7.50% 4066
4x8x68x27 - T#1 Shear wall M Y Y 3380.9 2.3 1.8 7.50% 8561
4x8x68x27 - T#1 Bearing wall C Y N 1380.18 3.02 2.09 3.15% 2845
4x8x68x27 - T#2 Bearing wall C Y N 1211.92 2.87 3.99 2.98% 4561
Average 1296.05 2.95 3.04 0.03 3703
4x8x68x27 - T#1 Shear wall C Y Y 3459.28 2.12 2.01 2.21% 8493
4x8x68x27 - T#2 Shear wall C Y Y 3586.65 2.1 2.2 2.19% 10461
Average 3522.96 2.11 2.11 0.02 9477
Note: plf - pound linear foot
Here’s what’s next.
This thesis can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Thesis.
Lan, Xing. Seismic Performance Evaluation of Novel Cold-Formed Steel Framed Shear Walls Sheathed with Corrugated Steel Sheets, thesis, August 2017; Denton, Texas. (https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1011859/m1/33/: accessed May 23, 2019), University of North Texas Libraries, Digital Library, https://digital.library.unt.edu; .