Budget Reconciliation Legislation:
Development and Consideration
Bill Heniff Jr.
Consultant in American National Government
September 30, 1998
Budget reconciliation is an optional two-step process
Congress may use to assure compliance with the direct spending, revenue, and debt-limit
levels set forth in budget resolutions.(1) First, Congress includes
reconciliation instructions in a budget resolution directing one or more committees to
recommend changes in statute to achieve the levels of direct spending, revenues, and debt
limit agreed to in the budget resolution. Second, the legislative language recommended by
committees is packaged "without any substantive revision" into one or more
reconciliation bills, as set forth in the budget resolution, by the House and Senate
Budget Committees. In some instances, a committee may be required to report its
legislative recommendations directly to its house.
Development of Reconciliation Legislation
The reconciliation process begins with the inclusion in a
budget resolution of instructions to committees to change spending and revenue laws. The
instructions typically indicate the committee(s) directed to recommend changes and a date
by which the committee(s) must submit its recommended legislation to its respective Budget
Committee. The House directives usually specify recommended levels of direct spending and
revenue by committee, while the Senate directives usually specify the amount of change.
Reconciliation directives may also specify the amount by which the statutory limit on the
public debt is to be changed and instruct the House Ways and Means Committee and the
Senate Finance Committee to recommend such a change.
The dollar amounts in reconciliation directives are based
on assumptions about existing policies and the savings that would result. In some
instances, the assumed savings that would result from the specific changes in existing
laws are printed in the committee or conference report accompanying a budget resolution.
Committees are not, however, bound by these assumptions or suggestions. While a committee
is bound by the dollar amounts, there is no point of order against language that does not
comply with the reconciliation directives. Any lack of compliance may be addressed during
floor action, usually by an amendment offered to achieve greater compliance.
If only one committee is required to recommend legislative
changes, the committee reports its recommended legislation directly to its house. If more
than one committee is directed to report legislative changes, which is often the case,
those recommendations are submitted to the Budget Committees. The House and Senate Budget
Committees are responsible for assembling the committee recommendations into one or more
omnibus bills. The Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 does not allow
the Budget Committees to make any substantive changes to these recommendations, even when
they do not comply with the reconciliation instructions.
Consideration of Reconciliation Legislation
Once the Budget Committees report reconciliation
legislation to their respective houses, consideration is governed by special procedures.
These special rules serve to limit what may be included in reconciliation legislation, to
prohibit certain amendments, and to encourage its completion in a timely fashion.
Section 310(g) of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment
Control Act of 1974 prohibits the House or Senate from considering any reconciliation
legislation, or any amendment to a reconciliation bill, recommending changes to the Social
Security program. In the Senate, section 313, commonly referred to as the Byrd rule,
prohibits extraneous matter in a budget reconciliation bill. Under the Byrd rule,
extraneous matters generally include those that have no direct budgetary effect, that
increase spending or decrease revenue when a committee is not in compliance with its
reconciliation instructions, or that violate another committee's jurisdiction.
For additional information, see the following
CRS fact sheet: The Senate's Byrd Rule Against Extraneous Matter in
Section 310(d) of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment
Control Act of 1974 bars the House or Senate from considering any amendment to a
reconciliation bill that would increase the deficit. For example, an amendment that
increases spending above the level set forth in the bill must be offset by an equivalent
amount of spending reductions, revenue increases, or a combination of both. However,
section 310(d)(2) provides that in the Senate an amendment to strike out a provision in
the bill is always in order. Also, the Congressional Budget Act prohibits non-germane
amendments to a reconciliation bill.
During floor action on reconciliation legislation, the
Senate and House follow different procedures and practices. In the Senate, debate on a
budget reconciliation bill, and on all amendments, debatable motions, and appeals, is
limited to not more than 20 hours. After the 20 hours of debate has been reached,
consideration of amendments, motions, and appeals may continue, but without debate. The
Senate often will consider a substantial number of amendments. The Congressional Budget
and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 does not provide any debate limitations on a
reconciliation bill in the House. The House, however, regularly adopts a "special
rule" establishing the time allotted for debate and what amendments will be in order.
The House special rule typically has allowed for consideration of only a few major
The congressional budget process timetable outlined in
section 300 of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974, as amended,
sets June 15 as the deadline for Congress to complete action on any required
reconciliation legislation. However, Congress frequently does not meet this deadline.
Final action on reconciliation legislation usually depends on whether or not there is
substantial agreement between Congress and the President on the substantive provisions.
1. The process is provided by section 310
of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 (CBA), P.L. 93-344, titles I-IX, as amended.