State Techniques to Blunt the Governor's Item-Veto Power

State Techniques to Blunt the Governor's Item-Veto Power

Date: December 12, 1996
Creator: Fisher, Louis
Description: None
Contributing Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department
Line Item Veto Act of 1996: Lessons from the States

Line Item Veto Act of 1996: Lessons from the States

Date: December 26, 1996
Creator: Fisher, Louis
Description: None
Contributing Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department
Recess Appointments of Federal Judges

Recess Appointments of Federal Judges

Date: September 5, 2001
Creator: Fisher, Louis
Description: None
Contributing Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department
The Pocket Veto: Its Current Status

The Pocket Veto: Its Current Status

Date: March 30, 2001
Creator: Fisher, Louis
Description: None
Contributing Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department
National Security Whistleblowers

National Security Whistleblowers

Date: December 30, 2005
Creator: Fisher, Louis
Description: None
Contributing Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department
Military Tribunals: Historical Patterns and Lessons

Military Tribunals: Historical Patterns and Lessons

Date: July 9, 2004
Creator: Fisher, Louis
Description: None
Contributing Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department
Congressional Access to Executive Branch Information: Legislative Tools

Congressional Access to Executive Branch Information: Legislative Tools

Date: May 17, 2001
Creator: Fisher, Louis
Description: This report begins by reviewing the precedents established during the Washington Administration for withholding documents from Congress. Close examination reveals that the scope of presidential privilege is often exaggerated. Congress had access to more documentation than is commonly believed and might have had more had it pressed for it. Subsequent sections focus on various forms of congressional leverage: the power of the purse, the power to impeach, issuing congressional subpoenas, holding executive officials in contempt, House resolutions of inquiry, GAO investigations, and blocking nominations, all of which may force executive officials to release documents they would otherwise want to keep private and confidential. Even if Presidents announce perfectly plausible grounds for withholding documents, they may have to comply with the congressional will to achieve other more important goals.
Contributing Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department
Detention of U.S. Citizens

Detention of U.S. Citizens

Date: April 28, 2005
Creator: Fisher, Louis
Description: In 1971, Congress passed legislation to repeal the Emergency Detention Act of 1950 and to enact the following language: “No citizen shall be imprisoned or otherwise detained by the United States except pursuant to an Act of Congress.” The new language, codified at 18 U.S.C. §4001(a), is called the Non-Detention Act. This statutory provision received attention after the 9/11 terrorist attacks when the Administration designated certain U.S. citizens as “enemy combatants” and claimed the right to detain them indefinitely without charging them, bringing them to trial, or giving them access to counsel. In litigation over Yaser Esam Hamdi and Jose Padilla, both designated enemy combatants, the Administration has argued that the Non-Detention Act restricts only imprisonments and detentions by the Attorney General, not by the President or military authorities.
Contributing Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department
Military Tribunals: The Quirin Precedent

Military Tribunals: The Quirin Precedent

Date: March 26, 2002
Creator: Fisher, Louis
Description: None
Contributing Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department
House Resolutions of Inquiry

House Resolutions of Inquiry

Date: May 12, 2003
Creator: Fisher, Louis
Description: None
Contributing Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department
FIRST PREV 1 2 NEXT LAST