Use of prior odds for missing persons identifications

Use of prior odds for missing persons identifications

Date: June 27, 2011
Creator: Budowle, Bruce; Ge, Jianye; Chakraborty, Ranajit & Gill-King, Harrell
Description: This article discusses the use of prior odds for missing persons identifications. Identification of missing persons from mass disasters is based on evaluation of a number of variables and observations regarding the combination of features derived from these variables. DNA typing now is playing a more prominent role in the identification of human remains, and particularly so for highly decomposed and fragmented remains. The strength of genetic associations, by either direct or kinship analyses, is often quantified by calculating a likelihood ratio. The likelihood ratio can be multiplied by prior odds based on nongenetic evidence to calculate the posterior odds, that is, by applying Bayes' Theorem, to arrive at a probability of identity. For the identification of human remains, the path creating the set and intersection of variables that contribute to the prior odds needs to be appreciated and well defined. Other than considering the total number of missing persons, the forensic DNA community has been silent on specifying the elements of prior odds computations. The variables include the number of missing individuals, eyewitness accounts, anthropological features, demographics and other identifying characteristics. The assumptions, supporting data and reasoning that are used to establish a prior probability that will be combined ...
Contributing Partner: UNT College of Arts and Sciences
Response to: Use of prior odds for missing persons identifications - author's reply

Response to: Use of prior odds for missing persons identifications - author's reply

Date: February 1, 2012
Creator: Budowle, Bruce; Ge, Jianye; Chakraborty, Ranajit & Gill-King, Harrell
Description: This article is in response to an authors' reply to 'Use of prior odds for missing persons identifications.' This response is to the reply by Alex Biedermann, Franco Taroni, and Pierre Margot.
Contributing Partner: UNT College of Arts and Sciences