You limited your search to:

  Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department
Results 50211 - 50220 of 67,544
  |   |  
FCC Record, Volume 27, No. 11, Pages 8850 to 9847, July 30 - August 17, 2012

FCC Record, Volume 27, No. 11, Pages 8850 to 9847, July 30 - August 17, 2012

Date: [2012]
Creator: United States. Federal Communications Commission.
Description: Biweekly, comprehensive compilation of decisions, reports, public notices, and other documents of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission.
Contributing Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department
FCC Record, Volume 26, No. 19, Pages 14991 to 15893, October 24-November 10, 2011

FCC Record, Volume 26, No. 19, Pages 14991 to 15893, October 24-November 10, 2011

Date: [2011]
Creator: United States. Federal Communications Commission.
Description: Biweekly, comprehensive compilation of decisions, reports, public notices, and other documents of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission.
Contributing Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department
FCC Record, Volume 27, No. 10, Pages 7936 to [8849], July 13 - July 27, 2012

FCC Record, Volume 27, No. 10, Pages 7936 to [8849], July 13 - July 27, 2012

Date: [2012]
Creator: United States. Federal Communications Commission.
Description: Biweekly, comprehensive compilation of decisions, reports, public notices, and other documents of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission.
Contributing Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department
FCC Record, Volume 27, No. 12, Pages 9848 to 10799, August 20 - August 31, 2012

FCC Record, Volume 27, No. 12, Pages 9848 to 10799, August 20 - August 31, 2012

Date: [2012]
Creator: United States. Federal Communications Commission.
Description: Biweekly, comprehensive compilation of decisions, reports, public notices, and other documents of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission.
Contributing Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department
2005 Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission Report: Volume One

2005 Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission Report: Volume One

Date: September 5, 2005
Creator: United States. Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission.
Description: The Commission assessed the Department of Defense’s (DoD’s) closure and realignment recommendations for consistency with the eight statutory selection criteria and the DoD Force Structure Plan. The recommendations announced by Secretary Rumsfeld on May 13, 2005 comprised, by the Commission’s count, 190 separate DoD recommendations that would produce as many as 837 distinct and identifiable recommended BRAC “close" or "realign" actions. These 837 distinct actions also involved an additional 160 installations that would gain missions or resources due to the proposed closures and realignments. All told, the 2005 BRAC recommendations exceeded the number considered by all prior BRAC Commissions combined. In addition to the unprecedented number, many DoD recommendations were extremely complex, proposing intertwining movements between and among numerous installations. Other DoD proposals consolidated apparently unrelated actions within the same recommendation. Unlike prior BRAC rounds, the Commission evaluated DoD’s recommendations in the context of a stable or increasing force structure, an ongoing conflict in Southwest Asia, and the projected redeployment of 70,000 servicemembers and family members from Europe and Asia to the United States. The 20-year BRAC outlook required the Commission to make allowances for major uncertainties in the military and strategic environment. While acknowledging the importance of savings as ...
Contributing Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department
2005 Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission Report: Volume Two

2005 Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission Report: Volume Two

Date: 2005
Creator: United States. Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission.
Description: The Commission assessed the Department of Defense’s (DoD’s) closure and realignment recommendations for consistency with the eight statutory selection criteria and the DoD Force Structure Plan. The recommendations announced by Secretary Rumsfeld on May 13, 2005 comprised, by the Commission’s count, 190 separate DoD recommendations that would produce as many as 837 distinct and identifiable recommended BRAC “close" or "realign" actions. These 837 distinct actions also involved an additional 160 installations that would gain missions or resources due to the proposed closures and realignments. All told, the 2005 BRAC recommendations exceeded the number considered by all prior BRAC Commissions combined. In addition to the unprecedented number, many DoD recommendations were extremely complex, proposing intertwining movements between and among numerous installations. Other DoD proposals consolidated apparently unrelated actions within the same recommendation. Unlike prior BRAC rounds, the Commission evaluated DoD’s recommendations in the context of a stable or increasing force structure, an ongoing conflict in Southwest Asia, and the projected redeployment of 70,000 servicemembers and family members from Europe and Asia to the United States. The 20-year BRAC outlook required the Commission to make allowances for major uncertainties in the military and strategic environment. While acknowledging the importance of savings as ...
Contributing Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department
Rebooting the Government Printing Office: Keeping America Informed in the Digital Age

Rebooting the Government Printing Office: Keeping America Informed in the Digital Age

Date: January 2013
Creator: National Academy of Public Adminstration (NAPA)
Description: The conference report to the 2012 Consolidated Appropriations Act mandated that the National Academy of Public Administration (the Academy) conduct a broad operational review of GPO to (1) update past studies of GPO operations; (2) examine the feasibility of GPO continuing to perform executive branch printing; and (3) identify additional cost saving operational alternatives beyond those that GPO has already implemented.The Academy formed a five-member Panel of Fellows to conduct a ten-month study of the agency’s current role, its operations, and its future direction. The Panel determined that the federal government in the digital age must continue to ensure that the public has permanent access to authentic government information and that GPO has a critical role to play in meeting this need. GPO leaders have made significant progress in “rebooting” the agency from a print-centric to a content-centric focus, but the agency needs to make further business and operational changes. The Panel issued fifteen recommendations intended to position the federal government for the digital age, strengthen GPO’s business model, and further GPO’s continuing transformation. Among other things, the Panel recommended that Congress establish an inter-agency process to develop a government-wide strategy for managing the life-cycle of digital government information; GPO ...
Contributing Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department
Comparison of American, British, and German Standards for Metal Fits

Comparison of American, British, and German Standards for Metal Fits

Date: 1927
Creator: Fullmer, Irvin H.
Description: Report issued by the Bureau of Standards discussing the comparison of American, British, and German metal fit standards. The comparisons between national standards of the three countries are presented and described. This report includes tables, and illustrations.
Contributing Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department
Zinc and Its Alloys

Zinc and Its Alloys

Date: November 6, 1931
Creator: United States. Bureau of Standards.
Description: Report issued by the Bureau of Standards discussing world production of zinc and zinc alloys. History, metallurgy, and structural properties of zinc are presented. This report includes tables, illustrations, and photographs.
Contributing Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department
Life-Cycle Costing: A Guide for Selecting Energy Conservation Projects for Public Buildings

Life-Cycle Costing: A Guide for Selecting Energy Conservation Projects for Public Buildings

Date: September 1978
Creator: Ruegg, Rosalie T.; McConnaughey, John S.; Sav, G. Thomas & Hockenbery, Kimberly A.
Description: Report issued by the Bureau of Standards discussing the energy conservation of public buildings. As stated in the introduction, "this report focuses on the establishment of a technically correct, practical, standardized approach for evaluating proposed energy conservation improvements in public buildings" (p. 2). This report includes tables, illustrations, and photographs.
Contributing Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department