You limited your search to:
Department:
Political Science
Resource Type:
Paper
Language:
English
Collection:
UNT Scholarly Works
Popular Resistance, Leadership Attitudes, and Turkish Accession to the European Union
Date: April 14, 2011
Creator: Dean, Tahirah & Breuning, Marijke
Description: This paper discusses research on popular resistance, leadership attitudes, and Turkish accession to the European Union (E.U.). The longstanding E.U. members have continuously found ways to delay a positive decision on Turkey's membership. Although various reasons have been offered across time, it is undeniable that Turkey is perceived as culturally different by the public as well as political decision makers in the E.U. To what degree does this perception influence decision making regarding Turkey's entry into the E.U.? The author investigates this question through two strategies; first, the author will assess the benefits and costs of Turkey's admission to the E.U. This assessment will include economic and political issues that would affect the E.U. Second, the author will examine public opinion regarding European nationalism and Turkey using data from the Eurobarometer public opinion surveys for France and Germany. Are attitudes in favor of Turkey's accession from people who are less nationalistic? Are people who are nationalistic and strongly value the European identity more likely to be against the accession?
Contributing Partner: UNT Honors College
Permallink:digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc86167/
The First World War: American Ideals and Wilsonian Idealism in Foreign Policy
Date: April 3, 2008
Creator: Durant, Karis & Campbell, Randolph B., 1940-
Description: This paper discusses research on the first World War. Abstract: In 1917 when President Woodrow Wilson asked the U.S. Congress for a declaration of war against Germany, he promised that the Great War would be the "war to end all wars." Unfortunately, this idealistic promise was more than anyone could deliver. My research focuses on the influences that shaped President Wilson's idealism and how he expanded his ideals in persuading the American public to go to war. I refer to opinion and editorial sections from major newspapers across America to determine and demonstrate the degree of Wilson's idealism in public addresses and the general public response to his views. My research offers an explanation and an assessment of Wilson's idealism, including its expansion and significance in U.S. foreign policy since 1917.
Contributing Partner: UNT Honors College
Permallink:digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc86949/
"Actus non facit reum, nisi mens sit rea": An Investigation into the Treatment of mens rea in the Quest to Hold Individuals Accountable for Genocide
Date: March 30, 2006
Creator: Jung, Andrew M. & King, Kimi
Description: This paper discusses a research investigation into the treatment of mens rea in the quest to hold individuals accountable for genocide. This paper focuses on doctrinal controversies and examines how genocide is and has been addressed by modern tribunals, with special emphasis on the subjective mens rea (mental element) required for genocide.
Contributing Partner: UNT Honors College
Permallink:digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc84320/
Legitimacy and Participation: A Longitudinal Analysis of Public Opinion in Costa Rica, 2004-2008
Date: April 15, 2010
Creator: Pascoe, Henry & Booth, John A.
Description: This paper discusses a longitudinal analysis of public opinion in Costa Rica from 2004-2008. Abstract: This study analyzes in a longitudinal context the dimensional conceptualization of legitimacy set forth by Booth and Seligson in 'The Legitimacy Puzzle in Latin America,' in which they found that legitimacy was composed of six different dimensions: regime institutions, regime principles, local government, political actors, political community, and regime performance. This study first tests whether the evaluation level of each dimension of legitimacy remains constant. The second part of this study tests whether the dimensional structure of legitimacy remains stable over time using 2004 and 2008 Costa Rica Survey data, identifying issues that researchers who conduct longitudinal studies under this dimensional framework should address in order to yield empirically valid results, and challenging assumptions made in recent longitudinal studies.
Contributing Partner: UNT Honors College
Permallink:digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc84352/
When the Chief Dissents: Examining the Effect of Instiutional and Administrative Responsibilities, 1946-2008
Date: April 15, 2010
Creator: Redding, Kory & Collins, Paul M.
Description: This paper discusses research examining the effect of institutional and administrative responsibilities. The purpose of this research is to investigate the means by which chief justices choose to dissent from the majority on the United States Supreme Court. The author presents two competing theories concerning how a chief justice chooses to proceed once he places himself in the minority coalition. The first theory is the institutional responsibilities theory, which purports that the chief justice seeks to preserve respect and authority for the norm of consensus. Thus, the chief justice will author a dissenting opinion when he decides to dissent from the majority because the chief's decision to dissent signals a fundamental disagreement with the rule of law announced in the majority opinion. The second theory is the administrative responsibilities theory, which asserts that the chief justice is less concerned with institutional matters because of the plethora of administrative responsibilities that constrain his time. Therefore, the chief justice will join a dissenting opinion authored by one of his colleagues rather than authoring his own. The author tests these theories using data on the dissenting behavior of chief justices during the Supreme Court's 1946-2008 terms. The results indicate that chief justices are ...
Contributing Partner: UNT Honors College
Permallink:digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc84356/
Death Row Days: Factors Affecting the Rate of Execution in the State of Texas
Date: April 14, 2011
Creator: Samaniego-Kopsky, Rebekah & King, Kimi L.
Description: This paper discusses research on the factors affecting the rate of execution in the state in the Texas. Abstract: The Supreme Court of the United States, in Furman v. Georgia (1972), invalidated death penalty statutes across the country because offenders, under existing laws, were vulnerable to capricious sentencing. Despite attempts by states to reduce arbitrariness in the three decades since 'Furman' (1972), extra legal factors, particularly race, continue to influence every phase of capital punishment from the indictment to the sentence. The Court, in McCleskey v. Kemp (1987), refused to consider widespread racial bias as reason to overturn an individual's death sentence, but directed statistical analysts towards state legislators to affect change. In this paper, the author examines the effects of legal and extra legal factors to see if they continue to influence decision makers after the verdict. Specifically, the author examines the relationship between race of the offenders and race of the victims to see if that relationship is correlated with the length of time between conviction and execution. The author also considers the effects of the victim's cause of death, the reason the offender was eligible for the death penalty, and the nature of the relationship between the ...
Contributing Partner: UNT Honors College
Permallink:digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc84372/
The Subjectivity of State Legitimacy
Date: April 2, 2009
Creator: Siddiqi, Ahmed & Ruderman, Richard
Description: This paper discusses research on the subjectivity of state legitimacy. Political philosophers that have attempted to legitimize the state as an objectively just entity have traditionally drawn upon three distinct bases: consent of the ruled, the objectivity just nature of the state's laws, and the state's unique potential to reduce societal harms. This paper attempts to demonstrate the shortcomings of each strategy, specifically with respect to their shared reliance upon practical necessity as a rationalization for the alleged legitimacy of the state. This paper does not attempt to establish a criterion according to which the merit of a given state may be judged, but rather only to demonstrate that the state is, in every case, the mechanism by which the politically powerful impose their will upon society at large.
Contributing Partner: UNT Honors College
Permallink:digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc86946/
For-Profit Versus Nonprofit Microfinance: How are the poor affected?
Date: April 3, 2008
Creator: Weinberg, Brian R.; Cox, Gloria C. & McPherson, Michael
Description: This paper discusses research on for-profit and nonprofit microfinance and how the poor are affected. Abstract: Of the world's 6.5 billion people, 2.8 billion are living in poverty on less than $2 per day. After a general discussion of poverty among several perspectives, this research will focus on the microfinance industry. Microfinance has proven itself an effective poverty alleviation tool. Traditionally, the microfinance industry has been nonprofit, geared toward helping the poor rise from poverty through the provision of small loans to create or expand businesses. The need for additional funding capital and the growing popularity of the industry have spurred an industry-wide debate between the traditional nonprofit model and newer for-profit microfinance model ideals. Many social and economic trade-offs occur on the spectrum that shifts between these two models. As this industry continues to transform itself rapidly, this study works to explain the major points of the debate within the context of two microfinance institutions from both models (i.e., Alternativa Solidaria and Compartamos). Although there were several limitations such as time and funding, this paper offers ideas of how each might overcome their inadequacies in the future to find a stronger balance between funding, satisfying the market demand for ...
Contributing Partner: UNT Honors College
Permallink:digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc86952/
Palestinian Perspective on Peace with Israel
Date: March 30, 2006
Creator: Wright, Kelly & Sahliyeh, Emile F.
Description: This paper discusses research on Palestinian perspectives on peace with Israel. The century-long struggle between the Israelis and Palestinians has been transformed within the last 20 years. Although a trend toward peace and accommodation has emerged, another competing religious trend made compromise more difficult between the two communities. This paper explores the Palestinian perspective on peace and conflict with Israel. It examines political ideologies and Palestinian public opinion polls, as well as results of the recent elections. In the Palestinian political scene, a competitive, two-party system has emerged, dominated by Fatah and Hamas. While Palestinians support negotiations with Israel, the Hamas victory in the January 2006 elections further complicates the process. It will certainly have a major impact on the future of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict and possibly on the upcoming Israeli elections.
Contributing Partner: UNT Honors College
Permallink:digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc84350/