Technical Report Archive & Image Library (TRAIL) - 32,757 Matching Results

Search Results

National Uranium Resource Evaluation: Dyersburg Quadrangle, Illinois, Kentucky, Missouri, and Tennessee: Appendix C: Uranium Occurrence Report
Discussing the occurrence of uranium in the Dyersburg Quadrangle
National Uranium Resource Evaluation: Dyersburg Quadrangle, Illinois, Kentucky, Missouri, and Tennessee: Appendix D: Test Wells Statistics Indicating Wells With Gamma Ray Logs
Discussing test wells statistics for the Dyersburg Quadrangle
National Uranium Resource Evaluation: Dyersburg Quadrangle, Illinois, Kentucky, Missouri, and Tennessee: Appendix E: References for Geologic Map Index
Discussing references for the geological map index of the Dyersburg Quadrangle
National Uranium Resource Evaluation: Dyersburg Quadrangle, Illinois, Kentucky, Missouri, and Tennessee: Appendix F: Petrographic Descriptions of the Porters Creek Clay and McNairy Sand
Discussing petrographic descriptions of the Porters Creek clay and McNairy Sand
National Uranium Resource Evaluation: Dyersburg Quadrangle, Illinois, Kentucky, Missouri, and Tennessee: Appendix G: Results of Geochemical survey
Discussing the results of a geochemical survey for the Dyersburg Quadrangle
National Uranium Resource Evaluation: Dyersburg Quadrangle, Illinois, Kentucky, Missouri, and Tennessee: Appendix H: Analysis of Hydrogeochemical and Stream-Sediment Reconnaissance
Discussing the analysis of the hydrogeochemical and stream-sediment reconnaissance of the Dyersburg Quadrangle.
National Uranium Resource Evaluation: Dyersburg Quadrangle, Illinois, Kentucky, Missouri, and Tennessee: Appendix I: Hydrogeochemical Field Work
Discussing hydrogeochemical fieldwork for the Dyersburg Quadrangle
National Uranium Resource Evaluation: Dyersburg Quadrangle, Illinois, Kentucky, Missouri, and Tennessee, Appendix J-1: Examination of Gamma-Ray Logs
Appendix J of the geological studies on the Dyersburg quadrangle describes the gamma-ray logs of 19 wells that were reviewed for radiometric anomalies.
National Uranium Resource Evaluation: Dyersburg Quadrangle, Illinois, Kentucky, Missouri, and Tennessee: Appendix K: Methodology of the Cross-Sections
Discussing cross-sections of the Dyersburg Quadrangle
National Uranium Resource Evaluation: Eau Claire Quadrangle, Wisconsin and Minnesota
Purpose and scope: The Eau Claire Quadrangle, Wisconsin and Minnesota, was evaluated to identify geologic units and delineate areas that exhibit characteristics favorable for the occurrence of uranium deposits. All geologic environments to a depth of 1500 m (5,000 ft) were evaluated by means of surface investigations and available subsurface data. Each environment was categorized as favorable, unfavorable, or unevaluated for uranium deposits based on recognition criteria contained in the study of significant uranium districts worldwide (Mickle and Mathews, eds., 1978). Evaluation of the Eau Claire Quadrangle was conducted by Golder Associates, Inc., under subcontract to Bendix Field Engineering Corporation (BFEC), for the National Uranium Resource Evaluation (NURE) program, managed by the Grand Junction Office of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). The evaluation program began February 1, 1978, and ended February 1, 1980. Time spent by Golder personnel on literature search, field work, evaluation of data, and preparation of the final report totaled approximately 3.5 man-years.
National Uranium Resource Evaluation: Eau Claire Quadrangle, Wisconsin and Minnesota, Appendix A-D
Appendices containing data on uranium availability in the Eau Claire Quadrangle to accompany a report on U.S. uranium resources in Wisconsin and Minnesota.
National Uranium Resource Evaluation: Ekalaka Quadrangle, Montana, North and South Dakota
This report follows the evaluation of uranium resources in the Ekalaka 1°x 2° Quadrangle, Montana and North and South Dakota to a depth of 1,500 m (5,000 ft) using available subsurface geologic information.
National Uranium Resource Evaluation: Ekalaka Quadrangle, Montana, North and South Dakota [Plates]
The following plates depict the geology of the Ekala quadrangle in Montana, North and South Dakota.
National Uranium Resource Evaluation: Elk City Quadrangle, Idaho and Montana
From Introduction: "The Elk City Quadrangle (1º by 2º), Idaho and Montana, was evaluated to identify and delineate geologic environments that exhibit characteristics favorable for the occurrence of uranium deposits."
National Uranium Resource Evaluation: Elk City Quadrangle, Idaho and Montana, Appendix A-C
Appendices containing supplementary data on uranium availability to accompany a report on U.S. uranium resources in the Elk City Quadrangle, Idaho and Montana.
National Uranium Resource Evaluation: Elko Quadrangle, Nevada and Utah
From Introduction: "The Elko Quandrangle, in northeastern Nevada and western Utah between latitude 40º and 41º and longitude 114º and 116º (Fig. 1), was evaluated to identify geologic units and delineate areas that exhibit characteristics favorable for the occurrence of uranium deposits. Geologic environments were evaluated on the basis of surface investigations and limited subsurface data."
National Uranium Resource Evaluation: Elko Quadrangle, Nevada and Utah, Appendix A-D
Appendices containing data on uranium availability to accompany a report on U.S. uranium resources in the Elko Quadrangle, Nevada and Utah.
National Uranium Resource Evaluation: Emory Peak Quadrangle, Texas
Results of reconnaissance surveys of the Emory Peak quadrangle to determine the likelihood of uranium deposits of the area, and additional information about the location and classification of any deposits.
National Uranium Resource Evaluation: Emory Peak Quadrangle, Texas: Appendix A: Uranium Occurrences
Discussing occurrences of uranium in the Emory Peak Quadrangle
National Uranium Resource Evaluation: Emory Peak Quadrangle, Texas: Appendix B-1: Locations and Analyses of Samples
Discussing locations and analyses of samples from the Emory Peak Quadrangle
National Uranium Resource Evaluation: Emory Peak Quadrangle, Texas: Appendix B-2: Geochemical Samples
Discussing geochemical samples from the Emory Peak Quadrangle
National Uranium Resource Evaluation: Emory Peak Quadrangle, Texas: Appendix C: Uranium-Occurrence Reports
Discussing occurrences of uranium in the Emory Peak Quadrangle
National Uranium Resource Evaluation: Emory Peak Quadrangle, Texas: Appendix D: Petrographic Description
Discussing the Petrographic Description of the Emory Peak Quadrangle
National Uranium Resource Evaluation: Enid Quadrangle, Oklahoma and Kansas
Results of reconnaissance surveys of the Enid quadrangle to determine the likelihood of uranium deposits of the area, and additional information about the location and classification of any deposits.
National Uranium Resource Evaluation: Escalante Quadrangle, Utah
From Introduction: "The Escalante 1º X 2º Quadrangle, south-central Utah, (Fig. 1) was studied to identify and evaluate areas and geologic formations considered favorable for the occurrence of uranium deposits."
National Uranium Resource Evaluation: Escalante Quadrangle, Utah, Appendix A-E
Appendices containing data on uranium availability in the Escalante Quadrangle to accompany a report on U.S. uranium resources in Utah.
National Uranium Resource Evaluation, Flagstaff Quadrangle, Arizona
From purpose and scope: The purpose of this study is to identify and delineate areas favorable for the occurrence of uranium deposits "which could contain at least 100 metric tons of U308 with an average grade of not less than 100 ppm U308". The study was limited to depths of less than 1500 m (5000 ft). No attempt was made to make the economics of recovering uranium a criterion for selecting favorable areas, except that the uranium be in a "mineable configuration".
National Uranium Resource Evaluation: Flagstaff Quadrangle, Arizona
From Introduction: "The purpose of this study is to identify and delineate areas favorable for the occurrence of uranium deposits "which could contain at least 100 metric tons of U3O8 which an average grade of not less than 100 ppm U3O8." The study was limited to depths less than 1500 m (5000 ft)."
National Uranium Resource Evaluation: Flagstaff Quadrangle, Arizona, Appendix A-C
Appendices containing uranium occurrence reports for the Flagstaff Quadrangle in addition to tabulated chemical analyses of rock, water, and stream-sediment samples. Also included are spectrograhpic and delayed neutron analyses of rock samples. This data accompanies a report on U.S. uranium resources in Arizona.
National Uranium Resource Evaluation: Gallup Quadrangle, Arizona and New Mexico
From Introduction: "The purpose of the National Uranium Resource Evaluation (NURE) program is to identify and delineate areas and environments within the Gallup 1º x 2º Quadrangle, Ariz. and New Mex., that exhibit characteristics favorable for the occurrence of uranium deposits that have the potential to contain at least 100 metric tons U3O8 total endowment with an average minimum grade of 100 ppm (0.01 percent)."
National Uranium Resource Evaluation: Gallup Quadrangle, Arizona and New Mexico, Appendix A-E
Appendices containing an uranium occurrence table of the Gallup Quadrangle, in addition to uranium occurrence reports, a table of chemical analysis, and lists of test wells and stratigraphic sections to accompany a report on U.S. uranium resources in Arizona and New Mexico.
National Uranium Resource Evaluation: Gillette Quadrangle, Wyoming, South Dakota, and Montana
From Purpose and Scope: "The Gillette 1º x 2º Quadrangle, Wyoming, and South Dakota was evaluated to find volumes of rock considered favorable for uranium deposits and which could contain at least at 100 mt tons U3O8 with an average grade of 0.01 percent U3O8 or more. All geologic environments to a depth of 1,500 m (5,000 ft) evaluated through the use of surface investigations and subsurface information."
National Uranium Resource Evaluation: Gillette Quadrangle, Wyoming, South Dakota, and Montana, Appendix A-D
Appendices containing data on uranium resources in the Gillette Quadrangle to accompany a report on U.S. uranium resources in Wyoming, South Dakota, and Montana.
National Uranium Resource Evaluation: Glens Falls Quadrangle, New York, Vermont and New Hampshire
From Introduction: "The Glens Falls NTMS Quadrangle of New York, Vermont, and New Hampshire (Fig. 1) was evaluated to identify and delineate areas and geologic units that have characteristics favorable for uranium deposits. All geologic environments in the quadrangle were studied by surface methods and, where possible, were inferred to a depth of 1500 m."
National Uranium Resource Evaluation: Glens Falls Quadrangle, New York, Vermont and New Hampshire, Appendix A-D
Appendices containing uranium occurrence data for the Glens Falls Quadrangle in addition to tabulated chemical analyses and surface radioactivity data to accompany a report on U.S. uranium resources in New York, Vermont and New Hampshire.
National uranium resource evaluation: Grand Canyon quadrangle, Arizona
From Introduction: "The Grand Canyon Quadrangle (2º), northwestern Arizona (Fig. 1), was evaluated to identify geologic environments and delineate areas that exhibit characteristics favorable for uranium deposits."
National Uranium Resource Evaluation: Grand Canyon Quadrangle, Arizona, Appendix A-E
Appendices containing data on uranium availability in the Grand Canyon Quadrangle to accompany a report on U.S. uranium resources in Arizona.
National Uranium Resource Evaluation: Greeley Quadrangle, Colorado
Abstract: Eleven areas have been identified in the Greeley 1° x 2° Quadrangle, Colorado, that appear to be favorable for the occurrence of uranium having a minimum of 100 tons of U₃O at grades of 0.01 percent or better. Nine of these are in the Front Range metamorphic and igneous environment, and two are in the Great Plains sedimentary environment. The two favorable areas in the Plains are underlain by the Fox Hills and Laramie Formations and are favorable for "Texas" roll-type (Subclass 242) and "Wyoming" roll-type (Subclass 241) deposits. These two favorable areas have a combined area of approximately 7000 km², and they appear to have the greatest potential for uranium ore production of all the identified favorable areas. In the Front Range, the Jamestown district has a record of past uranium production and has the highest probability among the favorable areas in crystalline rocks of containing a minimum endowment of 100 tons U₃O at 0.01 percent or better. Known deposits and expected resources in the Jamestown district belong to the magmatic-hydrothermal class (Class 330), or to the autometasomatic class (Class 350), with perhaps some enrichment resulting from supergene processes (Class 360, authigenic, and Class 370, allogenic). The Log Cabin-Virginia Dale area is underlain by batholiths of Silver Plume and Sherman Granite. Both granites are anomalously rich in uranium and thorium and are believed to be favorable for contact metasomatic (Class 340), magmatic-hydrothermal (Class 330), authigenic (Class 360), and allogenic (Class 370) deposits. Classification of four environments in this area as favorable is based on geological and geochemical criteria and on the presence of small deposits and uranium occurrences belonging to the classes listed above. No large deposits of uranium are presently known in the area. The Longs Peak-St. Vrain batholith, another Silver Plume Granite batholith, is also highly …
National Uranium Resource Evaluation: Greeley Quadrangle, Colorado, Appendix A-C
Appendices containing data on uranium availability in the Greenly Quadrangle to accompany a report on U.S. uranium resources in Colorado.
National Uranium Resource Evaluation: Green Bay Quadrangle, Wisconsin
Results of reconnaissance surveys of the Green Bay quadrangle to determine the likelihood of uranium deposits of the area, and additional information about the location and classification of any deposits.
National Uranium Resource Evaluation: Green Bay Quadrangle, Wisconsin: Appendix A: Uranium Occurrences
Discussing uranium occurrences in the Green Bay Quadrangle
National Uranium Resource Evaluation: Green Bay Quadrangle, Wisconsin: Appendix B: Table of Chemical Analyses
Discussing Chemical Analyses of the Green Bay Quadrangle
National Uranium Resource Evaluation: Green Bay Quadrangle, Wisconsin: Appendix C: Uranium Occurrence Report
Discussing occurrences of uranium in the Green Bay Quadrangle
National Uranium Resource Evaluation: Green Bay Quadrangle, Wisconsin, Appendix D: Age Dates Keyed to Bedrock Geologic Map
This appendix provides a table recording ages of bedrock in relation to the bedrock geological map of Green Bay quadrangle.
National Uranium Resource Evaluation: Green Bay Quadrangle, Wisconsin, Appendix E: Description of Selected Radiometric Anomalies
This appendix describes five groups of selected uranium anomalies in the Green Bay quadrangle, Wisconsin.
National Uranium Resource Evaluation: Green Bay Quadrangle, Wisconsin: Appendix F: Uranium Occurrence Reports
Discussing occurrences of uranium from the Green Bay Quadrangle
National Uranium Resource Evaluation: Greensboro Quadrangle, North Carolina and Virginia
From Introduction: "The Greensboro Quadrangle is in North Carolina and Virginia between lat. 36ºN. and 37ºN. and long. 78ºW. and 80ºW. (Fig. 1). The quadrangle was evaluated to identify and delineate areas favorable for the occurrence of uranium deposits."
National Uranium Resource Evaluation: Greensboro Quadrangle, North Carolina and Virginia, Appendix A-F
Appendices containing data on uranium availability in Greensboro Quadrangle to accompany a report on U.S. uranium resources in North Carolina and Virginia.
National Uranium Resource Evaluation: Hamilton Quadrangle, Idaho and Montana
Results of reconnaissance surveys of the Hamilton quadrangle to determine the likelihood of uranium deposits of the area, and additional information about the location and classification of any deposits.
National Uranium Resource Evaluation: Hamilton Quadrangle, Idaho and Montana: Appendix A: Uranium Occurrences
Discussing uranium occurrences in the Hamilton Quadrangle
Back to Top of Screen