You limited your search to:

 Collection: Congressional Research Service Reports
Terrorism Insurance - Comparison of H.R. 3210, S. 2600, and Conference Report
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2845/
Terrorism Insurance - Comparison of H.R. 3210 and S. 2600
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2844/
Optional Federal Chartering for Insurers: Major Interest Groups
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs4674/
Optional Federal Chartering for Insurers: Major Interest Groups
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2842/
September 11 Insurance Litigation
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2841/
Terrorism Insurance - The 2002 Marketplace
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2828/
Should Banking Powers Expand into Real Estate Brokerage and Management?
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs4671/
Should Banking Powers Expand into Real Estate Brokerage and Management?
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs4670/
Should Banking Powers Expand into Real Estate Brokerage and Management?
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs4669/
Should Banking Powers Expand into Real Estate Brokerage and Management?
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs4668/
Should Banking Powers Expand into Real Estate Brokerage and Management?
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2827/
Should Banking Powers Expand into Real Estate Brokerage and Management?
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2826/
Terrorism Insurance in the Post September 11 Marketplace
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs1721/
Electricity Restructuring and Tax-Exempt Bonds: Economic Analysis of Legislative Proposals
Tax-exempt bonds reduce public power's interest cost on debt and enable it to lower the price of electricity. This subsidy makes taxpayers better off only if the private market fails to provide the correct amount of electricity. In general, the private market can provide the correct amount of electricity; in those cases when it can not, the tax-exempt bond subsidy is unlikely to correct the problem. Tax-exempt bond legislation has been consistent with this perspective that an interest subsidy for electricity production does not correct a market failure; its focus has been to prohibit the spread of subsidized public power beyond its traditional service areas. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs1222/
Insurance Regulation: Background and Issues
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs4650/
Insurance Regulation: Background and Issues
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs4649/
Insurance Regulation: Background and Issues
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs4648/
Insurance Regulation and Competition: Background and Issues
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs4647/
Insurance Regulation and Competition: Background and Issues
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2810/
Insurance Regulation and Competition: Background and Issues
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2809/
The U.S. Postal Service Response to the Threat of Bioterrorism Through the Mail
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2744/
Postal Service Financial Problems and Stakeholder Proposals
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2739/
The Quasi Government: Hybrid Organizations with Both Government and Private Sector Legal Characteristics
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs6224/
Privatizing the United States Enrichment Corporation
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs444/
Postal Reform
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs5887/
Postal Reform
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs4564/
Postal Reform
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs4563/
Postal Reform
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs4562/
Postal Reform
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs4561/
Postal Reform
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs4560/
Postal Reform
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs4559/
Postal Reform
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs4558/
Postal Reform
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs4557/
Postal Reform
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2725/
Postal Reform
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2724/
Postal Reform
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2723/
Postal Reform
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2722/
Postal Reform
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2721/
Small Business Administration: Overview and Issues
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs1689/
Small Business Administration: Overview and Issues
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs1193/
Small Business Administration: Overview and Issues
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs657/
Electricity Restructuring and the Constitutionality of Retail Reciprocity Requirements
Retail reciprocity requirements have been included in the electricity restructuring legislation of at least four states. These requirements mandate generally that out-of-state utilities which operate in a state “closed” to retail competition cannot market power to retail consumers in the “open” state. Because state reciprocity requirements enacted without congressional authorization are probably unconstitutional under the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution, Congress would have to include a reciprocity provision in federal electricity restructuring legislation if it wants to support the view that such a provision will increase competition. This report reviews the treatment of state reciprocity requirements by the U.S. Supreme Court and discusses Congress’ power under the Commerce Clause. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs1181/
OPEC Oil Production - Facts and Figures
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs1180/
Renewable Energy and Electricity Restructuring
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs962/
State-by-State Comparison of Selected Electricity Restructuring Provisions
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs1173/
FY2004 Supplemental Appropriations for Iraq, Afghanistan, and the Global War on Terrorism: Military Operations
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs4503/
Electricity Restructuring: Comparison of Comprehensive Bills
Once considered the nation's most regulated industry, the electric utility industry is evolving into a more competitive environment. Currently, the focus of this development is the generating sector, where the advent of new generating technologies has lowered both entry barriers to competitors of traditional utilities and the marginal costs of those competitors below those of some traditional utilities. This technological advance has combined with legislative initiatives, such as the Energy Policy Act (EPACT), to encourage the introduction of competitive forces into the electric generating sector. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs1170/
Electricity: The Road Toward Restructuring
The Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 (PUHCA) and the Federal Power Act (FPA) were enacted to eliminate unfair practices and other abuses by electricity and gas holding companies by requiring federal control and regulation of interstate public utility holding companies. Comprehensive energy legislation has passed the House and Senate. The House passed H.R. 6 on April 11, 2003. On July 31, 2003, the Senate suspended debate on S. 14, inserted the text of H.R. 4 (107th Congress) as a substitute, and passed H.R. 6. A conference agreement was reached November 17, 2003, and passed by the House the next day. H.R. 6 includes an electricity title that would, in part, repeal PUHCA, would prospectively repeal the mandatory purchase requirement under PURPA, and would create an electric reliability organization. On June 15, 2004, H.R. 4503, a comprehensive energy policy bill, passed the House. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs4442/
Electricity: The Road Toward Restructuring
The Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 (PUHCA) and the Federal Power Act (FPA) were enacted to eliminate unfair practices and other abuses by electricity and gas holding companies by requiring federal control and regulation of interstate public utility holding companies. Comprehensive energy legislation has passed the House and Senate. The House passed H.R. 6 on April 11, 2003. On July 31, 2003, the Senate suspended debate on S. 14, inserted the text of H.R. 4 (107th Congress) as a substitute, and passed H.R. 6. A conference agreement was reached November 17, 2003, and passed by the House the next day. H.R. 6 includes an electricity title that would, in part, repeal PUHCA, would prospectively repeal the mandatory purchase requirement under PURPA, and would create an electric reliability organization. On June 15, 2004, H.R. 4503, a comprehensive energy policy bill, passed the House. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs4441/
Electricity: The Road Toward Restructuring
The Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 (PUHCA) and the Federal Power Act (FPA) were enacted to eliminate unfair practices and other abuses by electricity and gas holding companies by requiring federal control and regulation of interstate public utility holding companies. Comprehensive energy legislation has passed the House and Senate. The House passed H.R. 6 on April 11, 2003. On July 31, 2003, the Senate suspended debate on S. 14, inserted the text of H.R. 4 (107th Congress) as a substitute, and passed H.R. 6. A conference agreement was reached November 17, 2003, and passed by the House the next day. H.R. 6 includes an electricity title that would, in part, repeal PUHCA, would prospectively repeal the mandatory purchase requirement under PURPA, and would create an electric reliability organization. On June 15, 2004, H.R. 4503, a comprehensive energy policy bill, passed the House. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs4440/