You limited your search to:

 Resource Type: Report
 Decade: 2000-2009
 Collection: Congressional Research Service Reports
Welfare Reauthorization: An Overview of the Issues
In February 2002, the Administration proposed its welfare reauthorization plan. The debate was dominated by controversy over the amount of child care funding and the Administration's proposed changes to Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) work participation standards. The final agreement reflects the same child care funding increase that was provided in House-passed welfare reauthorization measures in 2002 and 2003 ($1 billion in additional mandatory child care funding over five years). The 2005 Senate Finance Committee welfare reauthorization bill would have provided $6 billion in additional child care funding over five years. Though the final agreement would require states to increase the share of their families participating in TANF work activities, it does not include the Administration's proposal to set a 40-hour workweek standard or revise the activities that count toward the standard. The reauthorization debate also reflected a renewed focus on noncustodial parents and on family formation issues. The budget agreement includes responsible fatherhood initiatives and a scaled back version of the President's initiative to promote healthy marriages. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc85368/
Welfare Reauthorization: Overview of the Issues
In February 2002, the Administration proposed its welfare reauthorization plan. The debate was dominated by controversy over the amount of child care funding and the Administration's proposed changes to Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) work participation standards. The final agreement reflects the same child care funding increase that was provided in House-passed welfare reauthorization measures in 2002 and 2003 ($1 billion in additional mandatory child care funding over five years). The 2005 Senate Finance Committee welfare reauthorization bill would have provided $6 billion in additional child care funding over five years. Though the final agreement would require states to increase the share of their families participating in TANF work activities, it does not include the Administration's proposal to set a 40-hour workweek standard or revise the activities that count toward the standard. The reauthorization debate also reflected a renewed focus on noncustodial parents and on family formation issues. The budget agreement includes responsible fatherhood initiatives and a scaled back version of the President's initiative to promote healthy marriages. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc85369/
Welfare Reauthorization: An Overview of the Issues
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs8016/
Welfare Reform Research: What Do We Know About Those Who Leave Welfare?
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2069/
Welfare Reauthorization: Overview of the Issues
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs6791/
Welfare Reauthorization: An Overview of the Issues
In February 2002, the Administration proposed its welfare reauthorization plan. The debate was dominated by controversy over the amount of child care funding and the Administration's proposed changes to Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) work participation standards. The final agreement reflects the same child care funding increase that was provided in House-passed welfare reauthorization measures in 2002 and 2003 ($1 billion in additional mandatory child care funding over five years). The 2005 Senate Finance Committee welfare reauthorization bill would have provided $6 billion in additional child care funding over five years. Though the final agreement would require states to increase the share of their families participating in TANF work activities, it does not include the Administration's proposal to set a 40-hour workweek standard or revise the activities that count toward the standard. The reauthorization debate also reflected a renewed focus on noncustodial parents and on family formation issues. The budget agreement includes responsible fatherhood initiatives and a scaled back version of the President's initiative to promote healthy marriages. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc83875/
Welfare Reauthorization: Overview of the Issues
In February 2002, the Administration proposed its welfare reauthorization plan. The debate was dominated by controversy over the amount of child care funding and the Administration's proposed changes to Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) work participation standards. The final agreement reflects the same child care funding increase that was provided in House-passed welfare reauthorization measures in 2002 and 2003 ($1 billion in additional mandatory child care funding over five years). The 2005 Senate Finance Committee welfare reauthorization bill would have provided $6 billion in additional child care funding over five years. Though the final agreement would require states to increase the share of their families participating in TANF work activities, it does not include the Administration's proposal to set a 40-hour workweek standard or revise the activities that count toward the standard. The reauthorization debate also reflected a renewed focus on noncustodial parents and on family formation issues. The budget agreement includes responsible fatherhood initiatives and a scaled back version of the President's initiative to promote healthy marriages. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc83876/
Welfare Reform: An Issue Overview
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs10024/
Welfare Reform: An Issue Overview
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs5709/
Welfare Reform: An Issue Overview
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs5713/
Welfare Reform: An Issue Overview
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs5715/
Welfare Reform: An Issue Overview
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs5712/
Welfare Reform: An Issue Overview
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs5711/
Welfare Reform: An Issue Overview
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs5717/
Welfare Reform: An Issue Overview
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs5710/
Welfare Reform: An Issue Overview
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs5718/
Welfare Reform: An Issue Overview
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs5714/
Welfare Reform: An Issue Overview
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs5719/
Welfare Reform: An Issue Overview
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs5716/
Welfare Reform: An Issue Overview
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs5722/
Welfare Reform: An Issue Overview
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs5721/
Welfare Reform: An Issue Overview
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs5720/
Welfare Reform: An Issue Overview
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs6118/
Welfare Reform: An Issue Overview
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2065/
Comparison of Proposed Charitable Choice Act of 2001 with Current Charitable Choice Law
This report provides a side-by-side comparison of the charitable choice provisions of H.R. 7 with those of the 1996 welfare reform law (P.L. 104-193) and of later laws that extended charitable choice rules to the Community Services Block Grant Act (P.L. 105-285) and to substance abuse treatment and prevention services under the Public Health Service Act (P.L 106-310 and P.L. 106-554). digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2068/
Welfare Reform: An Issue Overview
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2066/
Welfare Reform: TANF Provisions Related to Marriage and Two-Parent Families
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2070/
Welfare Reform: An Issue Overview
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs3678/
Welfare Reform: An Issue Overview
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs3679/
Welfare Reauthorization: A Side-By-Side Comparison of Current Law, Senate Committee-Approved and House Budget Reconciliation Bill Provisions
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs7937/
Welfare Reform: An Issue Overview
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs3680/
Welfare Reform: An Issue Overview
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs3683/
Welfare Reform: An Issue Overview
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs3682/
Welfare Reform: An Issue Overview
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs3681/
Job Training: Characteristics of Workforce Training Participants
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs1848/
Trends in Welfare, Work and the Economic Well-Being of Female-Headed Families with Children: 1987-2000
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2067/
Welfare Reform: TANF Activities to Reduce Nonmarital Pregnancy
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2071/
How Medicaid Works: Program Basics
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs5938/
Medicaid: A Primer
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs8053/
The Homeless Management Information System
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs7973/
Medicaid: A Fact Sheet
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs7053/
How Medicaid Works - Program Basics
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs7424/
Medicaid Issues for the 109th Congress
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs7617/
Charitable Choice, Faith-Based Initiatives, and TANF
This report is one in the series of reports that discusses the Charitable Choice Act of 2001 (Title II of the House bill) and its rules, as well as the charitable choice laws, and other areas of this program. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs10198/
TANF Sanctions - Brief Summary
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs1945/
Child Welfare and TANF Implementation: Recent Findings
This report examines recent research findings about Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) implementation as it has affected the nation’s child welfare system. The nation’s program of cash aid for needy families with children (TANF) and its program to protect and care for children who are abused or neglected (child welfare services) are linked by history and share some of the same clients who have similar service needs. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs8181/
Welfare Reform: TANF Trends and Data
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs5708/
Charitable Choice, Faith-Based Initiatives, and TANF
The 108th Congress has resumed efforts to pass tax incentives for private giving (S. 476, passed by the Senate on April 9, and H.R. 7, introduced May 7, 2003). However, these bills do not contain provisions intended to promote religious organizations as providers of federally funded social services – charitable choice provisions.. The House voted in 2001 to extend charitable choice rules, which now apply to a limited set of programs, to numerous new programs (H.R. 7 in the 107th Congress), as the President urged, but the Senate refused. However, in an Executive Order, President Bush on December 12, 2002, directed six cabinet-level departments and the Agency for International Development (AID) to bring policies concerning social service programs into line with charitable choice principles set forth in the Order. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs5457/
Charitable Choice, Faith-Based Initiatives, and TANF
The 108th Congress has resumed efforts to pass tax incentives for private giving (S. 476, passed by the Senate on April 9, and H.R. 7, introduced May 7, 2003). However, these bills do not contain provisions intended to promote religious organizations as providers of federally funded social services – charitable choice provisions.. The House voted in 2001 to extend charitable choice rules, which now apply to a limited set of programs, to numerous new programs (H.R. 7 in the 107th Congress), as the President urged, but the Senate refused. However, in an Executive Order, President Bush on December 12, 2002, directed six cabinet-level departments and the Agency for International Development (AID) to bring policies concerning social service programs into line with charitable choice principles set forth in the Order. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs5458/
Charitable Choice, Faith-Based Initiatives, and TANF
The 107th Congress did not pass tax incentives for private giving or legislation intended to assure equal treatment of religious organizations as providers of social services (provisions in S. 1924, the original CARE bill). The House voted to extend charitable choice rules to numerous new programs (H.R. 7), as the President urged, but the Senate refused. However, in an Executive Order, President Bush on December 12, 2002, directed six cabinet-level departments and the Agency for International Development (AID) to bring policies concerning social service programs into line with charitable choice principles set forth in the Order. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs5456/
FIRST PREV 1 2 3 NEXT LAST