You limited your search to:

 Collection: Congressional Research Service Reports
Trade and the Americas

Trade and the Americas

Date: July 29, 2003
Creator: Ahearn, Raymond J
Description: None
Contributing Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department
Trade and the Americas

Trade and the Americas

Date: June 18, 2003
Creator: Ahearn, Raymond J.
Description: None
Contributing Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department
Trade and the Americas

Trade and the Americas

Date: May 12, 2003
Creator: Ahearn, Raymond J.
Description: None
Contributing Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department
Trade and the Americas

Trade and the Americas

Date: March 20, 2003
Creator: Ahearn, Raymond J
Description: None
Contributing Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department
Regional Free Trade Partners and U.S. Interests: What's Next?

Regional Free Trade Partners and U.S. Interests: What's Next?

Date: March 13, 1995
Creator: Ahearn, Raymond J
Description: None
Contributing Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department
The Jackson-Vanik Amendment and Candidate Countries for WTO Accession: Issues for Congress

The Jackson-Vanik Amendment and Candidate Countries for WTO Accession: Issues for Congress

Date: June 15, 2012
Creator: Cooper, William H.
Description: This report gives an analysis of the unconditional most-favored-nation (MFN) status, or in U.S. statutory parlance, normal trade relations (NTR) status, which is a fundamental principle of the World Trade Organization (WTO). This conflicts with the U.S. laws under Title IV of the Trade Act of 1974 that limits trade status with several nations undergoing accession into the WTO. On June 12, 2012, Sen. Max Baucus introduced a bill with bipartisan co-sponsorship to authorize PNTR for Russia. The report includes information about MFN status and the WTO, the Jackson-Vanik Amendment restricting trade, the case of China, and prospective WTO accessions.
Contributing Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department
The Future of U.S. Trade Policy: An Analysis of Issues and Options for the 112th Congress

The Future of U.S. Trade Policy: An Analysis of Issues and Options for the 112th Congress

Date: January 4, 2011
Creator: Cooper, William H.
Description: Report that discusses the trade issues that the 112th Congress could face and the political and economic context in which these issues are being debated.
Contributing Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department
Country-of-Origin Labeling for Foods and the WTO Trade Dispute on Meat Labeling

Country-of-Origin Labeling for Foods and the WTO Trade Dispute on Meat Labeling

Date: September 16, 2013
Creator: Jurenas, Remy & Greene, Joel L.
Description: This report covers the dispute between the U.S with its neighbors Canada and Mexico, who say that the recent country-of-origin labeling (COOL) system implemented by the U.S. Department of Agriculture is unfair and does not meet its original objectives. This dispute was brought before the WTO dispute panel and found to be valid. The report ends with a discussion of options for the U.S. in regards to modifying COOL to follow WTO rulings.
Contributing Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department
The U.S.-EU Beef Hormone Dispute

The U.S.-EU Beef Hormone Dispute

Date: April 22, 2014
Creator: Johnson, Renée
Description: This report discusses the long-standing and acrimonious trade dispute between the United States and the European Union (EU) over the EU's decision to ban hormone-treated meat.
Contributing Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department
Country-of-Origin Labeling for Foods and the WTO Trade Dispute on Meat Labeling

Country-of-Origin Labeling for Foods and the WTO Trade Dispute on Meat Labeling

Date: January 28, 2014
Creator: Jurenas, Remy & Greene, Joel L.
Description: This report covers the dispute between the U.S with its neighbors, Canada and Mexico, who say that the recent country-of-origin labeling (COOL) system implemented by the U.S. Department of Agriculture is unfair and does not meet its original objectives. This dispute was brought before the WTO dispute panel and found to be valid. The report ends with a discussion of options for the U.S. in regards to modifying COOL to follow WTO rulings.
Contributing Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department