You limited your search to:

 Collection: Congressional Research Service Reports
"Amazon Laws" and Taxation of Internet Sales: Constitutional Analysis
This report focuses on the ways in which the states' efforts to impose requirements on out-of-state retailers are limited by the Constitution. The report discusses recent state legislation as well as legislation introduced in the two most recent Congresses. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc462168/
501(c)(4)s and Campaign Activity: Analysis Under Tax and Campaign Finance Laws
This report discusses 501(c)(4) social welfare organizations, including the requirements necessary to maintain 501(c)(4) status and the requirements for annual reporting to the Internal Revenue Service and Federal Election Commission. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc463001/
Constitutionality of Retroactive Tax Legislation
Report that examines the constitutional provisions that might be implicated by retroactive tax legislation, including legislation that seems intended to punish past behavior. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc227817/
Tax Provisions to Assist with Disaster Recovery
Report that provides a basic overview of existing, permanent provisions that benefit victims of disasters, as well as past, targeted legislative responses to particular disasters. The relief is discussed without examining either the qualifications for or the limitation on claiming the provisions' benefits. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc227830/
Tax Benefits for Education in the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs458/
Tax Benefits for Education in the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997: New Legislative Developments
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs1245/
Tax Benefits for Education in the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997: New Legislative Developments
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs1816/
Tax Benefits for Health Insurance: Current Legislation
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs6383/
Tax Benefits for Health Insurance: Current Legislation
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs5007/
Tax Benefits for Health Insurance: Current Legislation
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs5008/
Tax Benefits for Health Insurance: Current Legislation
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs5009/
Tax Benefits for Health Insurance: Current Legislation
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs5010/
Tax Benefits for Health Insurance: Current Legislation
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs5936/
Tax Benefits for Health Insurance: Current Legislation
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs1810/
Tax Benefits for Health Insurance: Current Legislation
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs1809/
Tax Benefits for Health Insurance: Current Legislation
This report discusses a variety of potential proposals to change the tax benefits for health insurance and medical expenses, including measures that would expand the availability and attractiveness of health savings accounts (HSAs), or employer tax credits. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc824518/
The Tax Exclusion for Employer-Provided Health Insurance: Policy Issues Regarding the Repeal Debate
Employer-provided health insurance is excluded from the determination of employees' federal income taxes, resulting in significant tax savings for many workers. The federal income tax exclusion -- the focus of this report -- is criticized for several reasons. These arguments about the exclusion merit careful consideration as Congress is starting to debate broad health care reform for the first time in 15 years. This report discusses this issue at length, including advantages and disadvantages to keeping the income tax inclusion as Congress undergoes the health policy reform process. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc26302/
Tax Benefits for Health Insurance: Current Legislation
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs3140/
Tax Benefits for Health Insurance: Current Legislation
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs3141/
Tax Benefits for Health Insurance: Current Legislation
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs3142/
Tax Benefits for Health Insurance: Current Legislation
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs5004/
Tax Benefits for Health Insurance: Current Legislation
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs5005/
Tax Benefits for Health Insurance: Current Legislation
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs5006/
Tax Benefits for Health Insurance: Current Legislation
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs3138/
Tax Benefits for Health Insurance: Current Legislation
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs3139/
Tuition Tax Credits
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs8858/
Fish and Wildlife Service: Compensation to Local Governments
The Refuge Revenue Sharing Fund (RRSF) was enacted in response to the concern of local governments regarding losses to their tax base due to the presence of federally owned land under the jurisdiction of the Fish and Wildlife Service. This report outlines recent history of RRSF payment levels. It examines the RRSF and describes how the fund differs in its treatment of reserved and acquired lands under the jurisdiction of FWS. The report also examines the Payment in Lieu of Taxes (PILT) program in detail. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc26021/
Alternative Minimum Taxpayers by State: 2009, 2010, and Projections for 2012
Report that breaks down, state-by-state, the percentage of taxpayers subject to Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT), and also maps out these projections for the year 2012. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc228138/
Consumption Taxes and the Level and Composition of Saving
This report examines how the composition of saving might change with the introduction of a consumption tax. Specifically, the report analyzes the possible impact of a consumption based tax system on various forms and levels of saving. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs1950/
Federal Deductibility of State and Local Taxes
This report provides a brief history of deductible state and local taxes, and discusses deduction for real estate property taxes, deductions for income, sales, and use taxes. The report also discusses policy alternatives and current legislation. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc795427/
Funding School Renovation: Qualified Zone Academy Bonds vs. Traditional Tax-Exempt Bonds
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs1649/
Internet Commerce and State Sales and Use Taxes
In theory, state sales and use taxes are based on the destination principle, which prescribes that taxes should be paid where the consumption takes place. States are concerned because they anticipate gradually losing more tax revenue as the growth of Internet commerce allows more residents to buy products from vendors located out-of-state and evade use taxes. The size of the revenue loss from Internet commerce and subsequent tax evasion is uncertain. Congress is involved in this issue because commerce conducted by parties in different states over the Internet falls under the Commerce Clause of the Constitution. The degree of congressional involvement is an open question. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs10193/
Internet Commerce and State Sales and Use Taxes
State governments rely on sales and use taxes for approximately one-third (32.3%) of their total tax revenue – or approximately $174 billion in FY2000. Local governments derived 16.4% of their tax revenue or $51.6 billion from local sales and use taxes in FY1999. Both state and local sales taxes are collected by vendors at the time of transaction and are levied at a percentage of a product’s retail price. Alternatively, use taxes are not collected by vendors if they do not have nexus (loosely defined as a physical presence) in the consumer’s state. Consumers are required to remit use taxes to their taxing jurisdiction. However, compliance with this requirement is quite low. Because of the low compliance, many observers suggest that the expansion of the internet as a means of transacting business across state lines, both from business to consumer (B to C) and from business to business (B to B), threatens to diminish the ability of state and local governments to collect sales and use taxes. Congress has a role in this issue because commerce between parties in different states conducted over the Internet falls under the Commerce Clause of the Constitution. Congress can either take an active or passive role in the “Internet tax” debate. This report intends to clarify important issues in the Internet tax debate. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs9627/
Internet Commerce and State Sales and Use Taxes
State governments rely on sales and use taxes for approximately one-third (32.3%) of their total tax revenue – or approximately $174 billion in FY2000. Local governments derived 16.4% of their tax revenue or $51.6 billion from local sales and use taxes in FY1999. Both state and local sales taxes are collected by vendors at the time of transaction and are levied at a percentage of a product’s retail price. Alternatively, use taxes are not collected by vendors if they do not have nexus (loosely defined as a physical presence) in the consumer’s state. Consumers are required to remit use taxes to their taxing jurisdiction. However, compliance with this requirement is quite low. Because of the low compliance, many observers suggest that the expansion of the internet as a means of transacting business across state lines, both from business to consumer (B to C) and from business to business (B to B), threatens to diminish the ability of state and local governments to collect sales and use taxes. Congress has a role in this issue because commerce between parties in different states conducted over the Internet falls under the Commerce Clause of the Constitution. Congress can either take an active or passive role in the “Internet tax” debate. This report intends to clarify important issues in the Internet tax debate. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs9285/
Internet Commerce and State Sales and Use Taxes
State governments rely on sales and use taxes for approximately one-third (33.6%) of their total tax revenue - or approximately $179 billion in FY2002 .' Local governments derived 12.4% of their tax revenue or $44 .1 billion from local sales and use taxes in FY20012 Both state and local sales taxes are collected by vendors at the time of transaction and are levied at a percentage of a product's retail price. Alternatively, use taxes are not collected by the vendor if the vendor does not have nexus (loosely defined as a physical presence) in the consumer's state . Consumers are required to remit use taxes to their taxing jurisdiction . However, compliance with this requirement is quite low. Because of the low compliance, many observers suggest that the expansion of the internet as a means of transacting business across state lines, both from business to consumer (B to C) and from business to business (B to B), threatens to diminish the ability of state and local governments to collect sales and use taxes . Congress has a role in this issue because commerce between parties in different states conducted over the Internet falls under the Commerce Clause of the Constitution.' Congress can either take an active or passive role in the "Internet tax" debate. This report intends to clarify important issues in the Internet tax debate . digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs5745/
Internet Transactions and the Sales Tax
This report is an introduction to the economics of electronic commerce and its potential impact on sales and use tax collections. Presently, 45 states (and the District of Columbia) require that retail outlets add a fixed percentage to the sales price of all taxable items (inclusive of federally imposed excise taxes). digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs1105/
State and Local Sales and Use Taxes and Internet Commerce
In theory, state sales and use taxes are based on the destination principle, which prescribes that taxes should be paid where the consumption takes place. States are concerned because they anticipate gradually losing more tax revenue as the growth of Internet commerce allows more residents to buy products from vendors located out-of-state and evade use taxes. The size of the revenue loss from Internet commerce and subsequent tax evasion is uncertain. Congress is involved in this issue because commerce conducted by parties in different states over the Internet falls under the Commerce Clause of the Constitution. The degree of congressional involvement is an open question. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs10474/
State and Local Sales and Use Taxes and Internet Commerce
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs9752/
State and Local Sales and Use Taxes and Internet Commerce
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs9320/
State Corporate Income Taxes: A Description and Analysis
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs9301/
State Corporate Income Taxes: A Description and Analysis
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs9311/
State Estate and Gift Tax Revenue
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs7313/
State Estate and Gift Tax Revenue
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs5388/
State Revenue from Estate, Inheritance, and Gift Taxes
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs1944/
State Taxation of Internet Transactions
This report discusses significant issues in the remote sales tax collection debate, beginning with a description of state and local sales and use taxes. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc463510/
State Taxation of Internet Transactions
This report intends to clarify significant issues in the remote sales tax collection debate, beginning with a description of state and local sales and use taxes. Congress has a role in this issue because interstate commerce, in most cases, falls under the Commerce Clause of the Constitution. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc462442/
State Taxation of Internet Transactions
This report intends to clarify significant issues in the remote sales tax collection debate, beginning with a description of state and local sales and use taxes. Congress has a role in this issue because interstate commerce, in most cases, falls under the Commerce Clause of the Constitution. Congress will likely be asked to choose between taking either an active or passive role in the debate. In the 111th Congress, H.R. 5660 (former Representative Delahunt) would have granted SSUTA member states the authority to compel out-of- state vendors to collect sales and use taxes. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc83968/
The Streamlined Sales and Use Tax Agreement: A Brief Description
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs9990/
The Streamlined Sales and Use Tax Agreement: A Brief Description
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs9966/
Tax Credit Bonds: Overview and Analysis
Almost all state and local governments sell bonds to finance public projects and certain qualified private activities. Most of the bonds issued are tax-exempt bonds because the interest payments are not included in the bondholder's (purchaser's) federal taxable income. In contrast, Tax Credit Bonds (TCBs) are a type of bond that offers the holder a federal tax credit instead of interest. This report explains the tax credit mechanism and describes the market for the bonds. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc491320/