You limited your search to:

 Collection: Congressional Research Service Reports
The Hatch-Waxman Act: Proposed Legislative Changes Affecting Pharmaceutical Patents
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs4053/
The Hatch-Waxman Act: Proposed Legislative Changes Affecting Pharmaceutical Patents
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs4054/
The Hatch-Waxman Act: Proposed Legislative Changes Affecting Pharmaceutical Patents
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs4055/
The Hatch-Waxman Act: Proposed Legislative Changes Affecting Pharmaceutical Patents
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs4056/
The Hatch-Waxman Act: Proposed Legislative Changes Affecting Pharmaceutical Patents
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs4057/
The Hatch-Waxman Act: Proposed Legislative Changes Affecting Pharmaceutical Patents
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs4058/
The Hatch-Waxman Act: Proposed Legislative Changes Affecting Pharmaceutical Patents
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs5774/
The Cost of Prescription Drugs for the Uninsured Elderly and Legislative Approaches
The purpose of this report is to explain why many of those who are least able to afford high drug costs are those who are most frequently charged the most. This report describes the basic economic theory underlying price differentiation and, in the context of the pharmaceutical market, analyzes the role and behavior of pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs), pharmaceutical manufacturers, and retail pharmacies, respectively. It also looks at a number of the criticisms that have been made of the practice of differential pricing. Finally, this report discusses various policy approaches aimed at assisting the elderly to purchase prescription drugs. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs1520/
President Bush's Proposed Medicare-Endorsed Drug Discount Card Initiative: Status and Issues
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2330/
President Bush's Proposed Medicare-Endorsed Drug Discount Card Initiative: Status and Issues
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2331/
President Bush's Proposed Medicare-Endorsed Drug Discount Card Initiative: Status and Issues
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs4069/
Medicare: Major Prescription Drug Provisions of Selected Bills
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2332/
Medicare: Major Prescription Drug Provisions of Selected Bills
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2333/
Medicare: Major Prescription Drug Provisions of Selected Bills
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2334/
Importing Prescription Drugs
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2335/
Importing Prescription Drugs
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2336/
Prescription Drug Importation and Internet Sales: A Legal Overview
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs5775/
Importing Prescription Drugs: Objectives, Options, and Outlook
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs5777/
Prescription Drugs: Importation for Personal Use
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs1522/
Ecstasy: Actions of the 107th Congress to Control MDMA
Legislation has been proposed in the 107th Congress to combat the use and abuse of Ecstasy (MDMA) and other “club drugs.” In a 2001 survey, 12% of 12th graders reported ever having taken the drug. The Ecstasy Anti-Proliferation Act of 2000, enacted by the 106th Congress, directed the U.S. Sentencing Commission to increase penalties for Ecstasy offenses. As of March 2001, MDMA penalties became more severe than for powder cocaine but less severe than for heroin. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2337/
Ecstasy: Actions of the 107th Congress to Control MDMA
Legislation has been proposed in the 107th Congress to combat the use and abuse of Ecstasy (MDMA) and other “club drugs.” In a 2001 survey, 12% of 12th graders reported ever having taken the drug. The Ecstasy Anti-Proliferation Act of 2000, enacted by the 106th Congress, directed the U.S. Sentencing Commission to increase penalties for Ecstasy offenses. As of March 2001, MDMA penalties became more severe than for powder cocaine but less severe than for heroin. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2338/
Ecstasy: Actions of the 107th Congress to Control MDMA
Legislation has been proposed in the 107th Congress to combat the use and abuse of Ecstasy (MDMA) and other “club drugs.” In a 2001 survey, 12% of 12th graders reported ever having taken the drug. The Ecstasy Anti-Proliferation Act of 2000, enacted by the 106th Congress, directed the U.S. Sentencing Commission to increase penalties for Ecstasy offenses. As of March 2001, MDMA penalties became more severe than for powder cocaine but less severe than for heroin. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2339/
Ecstasy: Legislative Proposals in the 107th Congress to Control MDMA
Legislation has been proposed in the 107th Congress to combat the use and abuse of Ecstasy (MDMA) and other “club drugs.” In a 2001 survey, 12% of 12th graders reported ever having taken the drug. The Ecstasy Anti-Proliferation Act of 2000, enacted by the 106th Congress, directed the U.S. Sentencing Commission to increase penalties for Ecstasy offenses. As of March 2001, MDMA penalties became more severe than for powder cocaine but less severe than for heroin. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs4073/
Legal Issues Related to Prescription Drug Sales on the Internet
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs5776/
Abortion Services and Military Medical Facilities
The purpose of this report is to describe and discuss the provisions for providing abortion services to military personnel, their dependents and other military health care beneficiaries at military medical facilities. The report describes the history of these provisions, with particular emphasis on legislative actions. Finally, this report discusses a number of proposals to modify the Clinton Administration provisions, as well as recently enacted legislation. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2404/
Abortion Services and Military Medical Facilities
The purpose of this report is to describe and discuss the provisions for providing abortion services to military personnel, their dependents and other military health care beneficiaries at military medical facilities. The report describes the history of these provisions, with particular emphasis on legislative actions. Finally, this report discusses a number of proposals to modify the Clinton Administration provisions, as well as recently enacted legislation. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2405/
Military Medical Care Services: Questions and Answers
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs1574/
Military Medical Care Services: Questions and Answers
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs1575/
Military Medical Care Services: Questions and Answers
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2485/
Military Medical Care Services: Questions and Answers
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2486/
Military Medical Care Services: Questions and Answers
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2487/
Military Medical Care Services: Questions and Answers
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2488/
Military Medical Care Services: Questions and Answers
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2489/
Military Medical Care Services: Questions and Answers
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs4245/
Military Medical Care Services: Questions and Answers
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs4246/
Military Medical Care Services: Questions and Answers
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs4247/
Military Medical Care Services: Questions and Answers
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs4248/
Military Medical Care Services: Questions and Answers
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs4249/
Military Medical Care Services: Questions and Answers
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs4250/
Military Medical Care Services: Questions and Answers
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs4251/
Military Medical Care Services: Questions and Answers
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs5816/
Health in Developing Countries: The U.S. Response
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs1735/
Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention: Federal Mandates for Local Government
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs708/
Patient Protection and Managed Care
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs3147/
Patient Protection and Mandatory External Review: Amending ERISA's Claims Procedure
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs1813/
ERISA Regulation of Health Plans: Fact Sheet
The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA, P.L. 93-406) places the regulation of employee benefit plans (including health plans) primarily under federal jurisdiction for about 124 million people. ERISA’s treatment of health plans is both complicated and confusing. ERISA has been interpreted as dividing health plans into two groups regulated differently under the law: about 54 million people are covered by self-insured plans for which the employer, rather than an insurer, assumes the risk for paying for covered services and about 70 million people are covered by purchased insurance (according to 2000 information from the Census Bureau and the Department of Labor). digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs1814/
ERISA Regulation of Health Plans: Fact Sheet
The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA, P.L. 93-406) places the regulation of employee benefit plans (including health plans) primarily under federal jurisdiction for about 124 million people. ERISA’s treatment of health plans is both complicated and confusing. ERISA has been interpreted as dividing health plans into two groups regulated differently under the law: about 54 million people are covered by self-insured plans for which the employer, rather than an insurer, assumes the risk for paying for covered services and about 70 million people are covered by purchased insurance (according to 2000 information from the Census Bureau and the Department of Labor). digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs5014/
OSHA Reform: "Partnership" with Employers
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs1851/
Terrorism: The New Occupational Hazard
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs3229/
Substantive Due Process and a Right to Clone
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs3240/