You limited your search to:

 Collection: Congressional Research Service Reports
Federal Railroad Safety Program and Reauthorization Issues

Federal Railroad Safety Program and Reauthorization Issues

Date: December 16, 2002
Creator: Rothberg, Paul F & Williamson, John
Description: None
Contributing Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department
Federal Railroad Safety Program and Reauthorization Issues

Federal Railroad Safety Program and Reauthorization Issues

Date: March 12, 2003
Creator: Rothberg, Paul F & Williamson, John
Description: None
Contributing Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department
Federal Railroad Safety Program and Reauthorization Issues

Federal Railroad Safety Program and Reauthorization Issues

Date: May 6, 2003
Creator: Rothberg, Paul F & Williamson, John
Description: None
Contributing Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department
Federal Railroad Safety Program and Reauthorization Issues

Federal Railroad Safety Program and Reauthorization Issues

Date: July 14, 2003
Creator: Rothberg, Paul F & Williamson, John
Description: None
Contributing Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department
Federal Railroad Safety Program and Reauthorization Issues

Federal Railroad Safety Program and Reauthorization Issues

Date: September 24, 2003
Creator: Rothberg, Paul F & Williamson, John
Description: None
Contributing Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department
The Siting of Wireless Communications Facilities: An Overview of Federal, State, and Local Law

The Siting of Wireless Communications Facilities: An Overview of Federal, State, and Local Law

Date: September 4, 2008
Creator: Ruane, Kathleen
Description: The siting of wireless communications facilities has been a topic of controversy in communities all over the United States. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 governs federal, state, and local regulation of the siting of communications towers by placing certain limitations on local zoning authority without totally preempting state and local law. This report provides an overview of the federal, state, and local laws governing the siting of wireless communications facilities.
Contributing Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department
Fairness Doctorine: History and Constitutional Issues

Fairness Doctorine: History and Constitutional Issues

Date: January 12, 2009
Creator: Ruane, Kathleen Ann
Description: The Fairness Doctrine was a policy of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC or Commission) that required broadcast licensees to cover issues of public importance and to do so in a fair manner. In 1987, after a period of study, the FCC repealed the Fairness Doctrine. The debate in Congress regarding whether to reinstate the doctrine continues today. This report covers the history of such debates.
Contributing Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department
Funeral Protests: Selected Federal Laws and Constitutional Issues

Funeral Protests: Selected Federal Laws and Constitutional Issues

Date: March 22, 2011
Creator: Ruane, Kathleen Ann
Description: This report discusses the Supreme Court's decision in Snyder vs. Phelps, which deals with the question of Westboro Baptist Church's tort liability, a church that has protested military funerals for a number of years. It analyzes the constitutional issues facing federal laws that create funeral protest buffer zones and examines legislative options for amending the federal laws restricting funeral protests, including H.R. 961.
Contributing Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department
Merger Review Authority of the Federal Communications Commission

Merger Review Authority of the Federal Communications Commission

Date: August 20, 2008
Creator: Ruane, Kathleen Ann
Description: This report will explain the merger review process at the Federal Communications Commission (FCC or Commission). Whenever companies holding licenses issued by the FCC wish to merge, the merging entities must obtain approval from two federal agencies: the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the FCC. The Commission and the DOJ do not follow precisely the same process or reasoning when examining the potential effects of proposed mergers. The Act permits the Commission to grant the transfer only if the agency determines that the transaction would be in the public interest. The public interest standard is generally broader than the competition analysis authorized by the antitrust laws and conducted by the DOJ. Therefore, the Commission possesses greater latitude to examine other potential effects of a proposed merger beyond its possible effect on competition in the relevant market.
Contributing Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department
Monopoly and Monopolization - Fundamental But Separate Concepts in U.S. Antitrust Law

Monopoly and Monopolization - Fundamental But Separate Concepts in U.S. Antitrust Law

Date: June 28, 1999
Creator: Rubin, Janice E
Description: This report illustrates the difference between the concepts of “monopoly” and “monopolization” by touching on the monopoly/monopolization thinking in the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice (DoJ) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), as illustrated in (1) statements on merger enforcement made by recent antitrust enforcement officials (generally indicative of the agencies’ concerns about competitive conditions and the effect of various market transactions), (2) the 1992 Horizontal Merger Guidelines 2 and (3) some observations on the Government actions against the Microsoft and Intel Corporations.
Contributing Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department