You limited your search to:

 Collection: Congressional Research Service Reports
Fruits and Vegetables: Issues for Congress
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2856/
Fruits and Vegetables: Issues for Congress
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs4687/
Fruits and Vegetables: Issues for Congress
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2861/
Fruits and Vegetables: Issues for Congress
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2860/
Fruits and Vegetables: Ongoing Issues for Congress
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs1224/
Ethiopian Food Situation: International Response
The United States has donated the largest share of the world-wide relief effort. Members of Congress nave passed legislation, the African Famine Relief and Recovery Act of 1985 (2.L. 99-8), authorizing emergency relief assistance to Ethiopia and other famine-stricken countries. Some observers favor trying to remove restrictions that prohibit long-term agricultural development assistance and other forms of economic aid to Ethiopia, but many continue to believe that aid to this Marxist-oriented nation should be limited to humanitarian relief. The Ethiopian food situation will probably remain a central issue among U.S. lawmakers and relief officials during the 99th Congress. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs9060/
Trends in U.S. Foreign Food Aid, FY1992-FY2002
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs9638/
Trends in U.S. Foreign Food Aid, FY1992-FY2002
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs9642/
International Food Aid: U.S. and Other Donor Contributions
The United States is the world's major provider of international food aid to low-income developing countries. This report provides three indicators of the U.S. contribution to global food aid: (1) shipments of major donors compiled by the International Grains Council, (2) U.S. contributions to the United Nations World Food Program (WFP), and (3) the U.S. commitment under the Food Aid Convention (FAC). digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs10577/
Federal Food Assistance: Hurricane Katrina
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs7612/
Indian Ocean Earthquake and Tsunami: Food Aid Needs and the U.S. Response
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs7334/
Department of Defense Food Procurement: Background and Status
In an effort to reduce costs, adopt commercial practices, and gain technological advantages, the DOD Food Policy Council directed the Defense Supply Center Philadelphia (DSCP) to establish a common food management system. Under DLA, DSCP is the inventory control point for food, clothing, textiles, medicines, medical equipment, general and industrial supplies and services for the military, their eligible dependents, and other non-DOD customers worldwide; under DSCP, the Subsistence Directorate serves as the operational manager for all food operations. This report will describe the origin, authority, policy, and military food acquisition process. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs6786/
International Food Aid: U.S. and Other Donor Contributions
This report provides three indicators of the U.S. contribution to global food aid: (1) shipments of major donors compiled by the International Grains Council (IGC), (2) U.S. contributions to the United Nations World Food Program (WFP), and (3) the U.S. commitment under the 1999 Food Aid Convention (FAC). digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc103231/
The Delaney Dilemma: Regulating Pesticide Residues in Foods -- Seminar Proceedings, March 16, 1993
A provision in the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, the Delaney Clause, appears to lower risks in the setting of tolerances for pesticide residues. It prohibits any substance from being added to processed foods if it induces cancer in man or animals. In reality, the provision created a dilemma because the zero-risk statute makes it difficult to regulate pesticides. Because of the prescription of Delaney, tolerances (legal limits) are established differently for carcinogens and non-carcinogens and in raw and processed foods. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs60/
The Delaney Clause: The Dilemma of Regulating Health Risk for Pesticide Residues
Under the authority of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is responsible for establishing tolerances for pesticide residues in or on foods and feeds. Tolerances are legal limits to the amount of pesticide residues that can be found on a raw agricultural commodity at the farm gate or in a processed food. The FFDCA has two sections, 408 and 409, which set up different and inconsistent criteria for setting tolerances for pesticide residues in foods. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs27/
Food Stamp Benefits for Legal Immigrants in P.L. 105-185
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs693/
Food Fraud and "Economically Motivated Adulteration" of Food and Food Ingredients
This report discusses food fraud, or the act of defrauding buyers of food and food ingredients for economic gain. It includes background information, an overview of available data and information repositories related to food fraud, federal activities involving food fraud, and Congressional actions involving food fraud. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc276904/
Food Safety Provisions of the 2008 Farm Bill
The report discusses the food safety provision in the 2008 Farm Bill. Food safety re-emerged as an issue in the 110th Congress following a series of widely publicized incidents — including adulterated Chinese seafood and pet food ingredient imports, findings of bacteria-tainted spinach, meat, and poultry produced domestically, and several large food recalls. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc94236/
Sugar Policy Issues
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs3710/
Sugar Policy Issues
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs3709/
Sugar Policy Issues
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs3708/
Sugar Policy Issues
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2098/
Sugar Policy Issues
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2097/
Sugar Policy Issues
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2096/
Sugar Policy Issues
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2095/
Sugar Policy Issues
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs3712/
Sugar Policy Issues
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs3711/
Sugar Policy Issues
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2094/
Sugar Policy Issues
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2093/
Sugar Policy Issues
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs1371/
Sugar Policy Issues
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs8566/
Meat and Poultry Inspection: Background and Selected Issues
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs8907/
Meat and Poultry Inspection Issues
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs10052/
Meat and Poultry Inspection Issues
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs10101/
Meat and Poultry Inspection Issues
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs10051/
Sugar Policy Issues
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs10095/
The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program: Categorical Eligibility
This report discusses categorical eligibility and some of the issues raised by it. It first describes the three different types of categorical eligibility: traditional categorical eligibility conveyed through receipt of need-based cash assistance, and the newer "narrow" and "broad-based" categorical eligibilities conveyed via TANF "noncash" benefits. It also provides recent information on current state practices with regard to categorical eligibility. Finally, the report discusses proposals to restrict categorical eligibility. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc227734/
Meat and Poultry Inspection Issues
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs4686/
Peanuts: Policy Issues
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs1723/
Meat and Poultry Inspection Issues
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs4681/
Meat and Poultry Inspection Issues
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2855/
Meat and Poultry Inspection Issues
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2854/
Meat and Poultry Inspection Issues
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2853/
Meat and Poultry Inspection Issues
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2852/
Meat and Poultry Inspection Issues
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs4685/
Meat and Poultry Inspection Issues
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs4684/
Meat and Poultry Inspection Issues
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs4683/
Meat and Poultry Inspection Issues
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs4682/
Meat and Poultry Inspection Issues
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2851/
Meat and Poultry Inspection Issues
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs1225/