You limited your search to:

 Collection: Congressional Research Service Reports
Internet Tax Bills in the 107th Congress: A Brief Comparison
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs1976/
Third Generation ("3G") Mobile Wireless Technologies and Services
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs1980/
Japan-U.S. Automobile and Parts Trade Dispute
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs267/
The 1995 Japan-U.S. Auto and Parts Trade Dispute: Terms of the Settlement and Implications
On June 28, 1995, the United States and Japan reached a settlement in a long-running dispute over access to Japan's market for automobiles and parts. 100-percent tariffs by the United States on imports of luxury cars from Japan had been threatened under a Section 301 unfair trade practices case dealing with the aftermarket for autoparts in Japan. This report describes the dispute, the settlement, and questions and issues that still remain. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs268/
Textile and Apparel Trade Issues
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs5581/
Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms: Economic, Program, and Policy Issues
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs1337/
Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms: Economic, Program, and Policy Issues
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs3552/
Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms: Economic, Program, and Policy Issues
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs3553/
Telecommunications Services Trade and the WTO Agreement
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2021/
Telecommunications Services Trade and the WTO Agreement
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs3554/
Textile and Apparel Trade Issues
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2022/
Textile and Apparel Trade Issues
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs3555/
Textile and Apparel Trade Issues
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs3556/
Trade Retaliation: The "Carousel" Approach
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2026/
Trade Retaliation: The "Carousel" Approach
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs3559/
The Amtrak Reform and Accountability Act of 1997 and Related Developments
The Amtrak Reform and Accountability Act of 1997, enacted December 2, 1997, authorized appropriations to Amtrak through FY2002. This CRS report summarizes the provisions of the Act and discusses related developments. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs1035/
Stormwater Permits: Status of EPA's Regulatory Program
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs821/
Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator Budget Request and Plan, FY2005-FY2009
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs6098/
Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator Budget Request and Plan, FY2005-FY2009
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs6100/
"Bunker Busters": Sources of Confusion in the Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator Debate
The Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator (RNEP), often called a “bunker buster,” is at present the subject of a cost and feasibility study to determine if either of two nuclear bombs, the B61 and the B83, could be modified, mainly by adding a heavy, pointed case, so as to be able to penetrate perhaps 10 meters into earth or rock. This penetration would increase the weapon’s ability, by a factor of 20 to 50, to destroy hardened and deeply buried facilities. The RNEP debate has received much attention and spawned much confusion. This report examines sources of confusion in this debate. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs6106/
Nuclear Earth Penetrator Weapons
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs5702/
Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator Budget Request and Plan, FY2005-FY2009
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs6114/
Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator Budget Request and Plan, FY2005-FY2009
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs6115/
Offshoring (a.k.a. Offshore Outsourcing) and Job Insecurity Among U.S. Workers
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs6122/
Influenza Vaccine Shortages and Implications
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs6128/
Softwood Lumber Imports: The 1996 U.S.-Canada Agreement
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs6357/
Industrial Competitiveness and Technological Advancement: Debate over Government Policy
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs6425/
Forms that Incorporate Abroad for Tax Purposes: Corporate "Inversions" and "Expatriation"
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs6378/
Comparison of Tax Incentives of Domestic Manufacturing: 108th Congress
The enacted provision of this legislation (H.R. 4520), following the passage of the Senate’s version (then S. 1637) and the House bill (H.R. 4520) followed the Senate version, which allowed a deduction and would cover unincorporated firms as well as corporations. However, the proposal contained the broader definition of manufacturing in the House bill which included oil and gas extraction, utilities, construction, and electricity. This report discusses the provisions in these two versions of the subsidy as well as some of the issues surrounding alternative methods of providing a manufacturing subsidy. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs6477/
Offshoring (a.k.a. Offshore Outsourcing) and Job Insecurity Among U.S. Workers
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs6480/
Association Health Plans: Legislation in the 109th Congress
An estimated 41.2 million people were without health insurance in 2001. Legislation under consideration by the 108th and earlier Congresses is intended to assist small employers in offering health insurance as a benefit to their workers. A new bill, H.R. 4281, introduced on May 5, 2004, The Small Business Health Fairness Act of 2003 (H.R. 6601s. 545), and a number of bills from the earlier Congresses include provisions creating new groups for small firms to join or encouraging the growth of existing groups so that small employers can band together to offer coverage to their employees. Opponents of the AHP approach raise concerns that unintended negative consequences would arise, negating the benefits that the new groups would create. While the proposed AHPs are not likely to immediately undermine the small group market, they are likely to require additional features to significantly expand insurance coverage among the uninsured. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs6676/
Association Health Plans, Health Marts and the Small Group Market for Health Insurance
An estimated 41.2 million people were without health insurance in 2001. Legislation under consideration by the 108th and earlier Congresses is intended to assist small employers in offering health insurance as a benefit to their workers. A new bill, H.R. 4281, introduced on May 5, 2004, The Small Business Health Fairness Act of 2003 (H.R. 6601s. 545), and a number of bills from the earlier Congresses include provisions creating new groups for small firms to join or encouraging the growth of existing groups so that small employers can band together to offer coverage to their employees. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs6562/
Comparison of Tax Incentives of Domestic Manufacturing in Current Legislative Proposals
This report presents two approaches that have quite different implications for tax administration and Compliance. First, additional domestic investment would have both a direct tax benefit effect, and an indirect effect through increasing the ratio of domestic to world production. Secondly, if one considers the other provisions of H.R. 2896 and S. 1637, these provisions provide benefits (in some cases quite large benefits) to investment overseas that could more than offset any domestic incentive. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs6538/
Chemical Facility Security
Facilities handling large amounts of potentially hazardous chemical (i.e., chemical facilities) might be of interest to terrorists, either as targets for direct attacks meant to release chemicals into the community or as a source of chemicals for use elsewhere. For any individual facility, the risk is very small, but the risks may be increasing -- with potentially severe consequences for human health and the environment. Congress might choose to rely on existing efforts in the public and private sectors to improve chemical site security over time. Alternatively, Congress could expand existing environmental planning requirements for chemical facilities to require consideration of terrorism. Congress might also enact legislation to reduce risks, either by "hardening" defenses against terrorists or by requiring industries to consider use of safer chemicals, procedures, or processes. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs6749/
"Bunker Busters": Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator Issues, FY2005 and FY2006
The Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator (RNEP) program has been the most controversial nuclear weapon program in Congress for the last several years. Supporters argue that it is needed to attack hard and deeply buried targets (such as leadership bunkers) in countries of concern, thereby deterring or defeating challenges from such nations; critics assert that RNEP would lower the threshold for use of nuclear weapons and prompt other nations to develop nuclear weapons to deter U.S. attack. This report presents a brief technical background on RNEP, then discusses the history of RNEP in Congress and the Administration for the FY2005 and FY2006 budget cycles. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs6754/
"Bunker Busters": Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator Issues, FY2005 and FY2006
The Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator (RNEP) program has been the most controversial nuclear weapon program in Congress for the last several years. Supporters argue that it is needed to attack hard and deeply buried targets (such as leadership bunkers) in countries of concern, thereby deterring or defeating challenges from such nations; critics assert that RNEP would lower the threshold for use of nuclear weapons and prompt other nations to develop nuclear weapons to deter U.S. attack. This report presents a brief technical background on RNEP, then discusses the history of RNEP in Congress and the Administration for the FY2005 and FY2006 budget cycles. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs6755/
"Bunker Busters": Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator Issues, FY2005 and FY2006
The Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator (RNEP) program has been the most controversial nuclear weapon program in Congress for the last several years. Supporters argue that it is needed to attack hard and deeply buried targets (such as leadership bunkers) in countries of concern, thereby deterring or defeating challenges from such nations; critics assert that RNEP would lower the threshold for use of nuclear weapons and prompt other nations to develop nuclear weapons to deter U.S. attack. This report presents a brief technical background on RNEP, then discusses the history of RNEP in Congress and the Administration for the FY2005 and FY2006 budget cycles. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs6833/
Industrial Competitiveness and Technological Advancement: Debate over Government Policy
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs7044/
Terrorism Insurance - The 2002 Marketplace
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs7013/
International Tax Provisions of the American Competitiveness and Corporate Accountability Act (H.R. 5095)
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs7031/
Petroleum Refining: Economic Performance and Challenges for the Future
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs7271/
Textile and Apparel Quota Phaseout: Some Economic Implications
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs7315/
Outsourcing and Insourcing Jobs in the U.S. Economy: An Overview of Evidence Based on Foreign Investment Data
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs7325/
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation: A Fact Sheet
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs7402/
Congressionally Chartered Nonprofit Organizations ("Title 36 Corporations"): What They Are and How Congress Treats Them
This report discusses a category of congressionally chartered nonprofit organizations that have as their purpose the promotion of patriotic, charitable, educational, and other eleemosynary activities . Title 36 of the United States Code, where such corporate organizations are listed with their charters, was re-codified by law in 1998 (EL 105-225). digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs7367/
Small Business Tax Benefits: Overview and Economic Analysis
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs7379/
Congress’s Power Under the Commerce Clause: The Impact of Recent Court Decisions
This report will first review the current Supreme Court case law with respect to the Commerce Clause. Second, it will examine the analysis used and the results of the three lower court opinions. Finally, two areas of tension that appear to exist within the Court’s jurisprudence, and the potential implications that resolution of these conflicts may have on congressional power under the Commerce Clause will be examined. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs7382/
Can the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation Be Restored to Financial Health?
In 2003, the Bush administration made a proposal for reform to strengthen pension plan funding and the financial condition of the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC). Various bills with the goal of reforming the PBGC were proposed in the 108th Congress but none were enacted into law. The doubling of the PBGC deficit from fiscal 2003 to fiscal 2004, has heightened awareness about the PBGC deficit situation. Congressional leaders from both parties have announced their intention to move aggressively on legislative solutions in the 109th Congress. digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs7394/
Postal Reform Bills: A Side-by-Side Comparison of H.R. 22 and S. 662
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs7445/
Postal Reform Bills: A Side-by-Side Comparison of H.R. 22 and S. 662
No Description digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs7446/