The geopressured zone, assuming the presence of natural gas and high water productivity, may be used to produce economical electric power only if the water is at least 375 F or a means of conversion more efficient than flashing is found. The design and costing of a double-flash 25-megawatt plant using water at 325 F gave a capital cost of $678/kwh, a fuel cost of 63?/M Btu and a unit power cost of 46 mills/kwh. The conversion efficiency of the plant, including hydraulic turbine energy from the well head overpressure, was 10.3%. This low efficiency accounts for the high unit …
continued below
Publisher Info:
Texas Univ., Austin (USA). Center for Energy Studies
Place of Publication:
Austin, Texas
Provided By
UNT Libraries Government Documents Department
Serving as both a federal and a state depository library, the UNT Libraries Government Documents Department maintains millions of items in a variety of formats. The department is a member of the FDLP Content Partnerships Program and an Affiliated Archive of the National Archives.
Descriptive information to help identify this article.
Follow the links below to find similar items on the Digital Library.
Description
The geopressured zone, assuming the presence of natural gas and high water productivity, may be used to produce economical electric power only if the water is at least 375 F or a means of conversion more efficient than flashing is found. The design and costing of a double-flash 25-megawatt plant using water at 325 F gave a capital cost of $678/kwh, a fuel cost of 63?/M Btu and a unit power cost of 46 mills/kwh. The conversion efficiency of the plant, including hydraulic turbine energy from the well head overpressure, was 10.3%. This low efficiency accounts for the high unit power cost. A one-well, 1.5-megawatt test facility will require a total capital cost of $6,661,000. Expansion of this site to a four-well, 10-megawatt pilot plant will require an additional capital expenditure of $27,843,000. The total capital cost for an independent 10-megawatt pilot plant was estimated at $31,777,000. It should be noted that the economics calculated in this report is based on industrial power plant experience. Maintenance, operating costs, and rate of return for industrial investment, as used in the calculations, do not reflect utility plant practices. The cost of power producing may compare more favorably with that of utility plants. Future power costs are projected to at least equal the costs expressed here.
This article is part of the following collection of related materials.
Office of Scientific & Technical Information Technical Reports
Reports, articles and other documents harvested from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information.
Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI) is the Department of Energy (DOE) office that collects, preserves, and disseminates DOE-sponsored research and development (R&D) results that are the outcomes of R&D projects or other funded activities at DOE labs and facilities nationwide and grantees at universities and other institutions.
Underhill, Gary K.; Carlson, Ronald A.; Clendinning, William A.; Erdos, Jozsef; Gault, John; Hall, James W. et al.Dow Chemical USA Report - Appendix B,
article,
January 1, 1976;
Austin, Texas.
(https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc873636/:
accessed April 17, 2024),
University of North Texas Libraries, UNT Digital Library, https://digital.library.unt.edu;
crediting UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.