Science: For Science's or Society's Sake? Owning the National Science Foundation's Broader Impacts Criterion

Description:

Article describing changes in the U.S. National Science Foundation's (NSF) merit review criteria. The authors argue that scientists are more likely to preserve their autonomy by embracing - or 'owning' - the new Broader Impacts Criterion rather than resisting it.

Creator(s):
Creation Date: March 1, 2012
Partner(s):
UNT College of Arts and Sciences
Collection(s):
UNT Scholarly Works
Usage:
Total Uses: 273
Past 30 days: 2
Yesterday: 0
Creator (Author):
Holbrook, J. Britt

University of North Texas

Creator (Author):
Frodeman, Robert

University of North Texas

Publisher Info:
Place of Publication: [Washington, D.C.]
Date(s):
  • Creation: March 1, 2012
Description:

Article describing changes in the U.S. National Science Foundation's (NSF) merit review criteria. The authors argue that scientists are more likely to preserve their autonomy by embracing - or 'owning' - the new Broader Impacts Criterion rather than resisting it.

Degree:
Physical Description:

4 p.

Language(s):
Subject(s):
Keyword(s): scientific research | Broader Impacts Merit Review | peer review | intellectual merit
Source: Science Progress, 2012, Washington DC: Center for American Progress
Partner:
UNT College of Arts and Sciences
Collection:
UNT Scholarly Works
Identifier:
  • ARK: ark:/67531/metadc86186
Resource Type: Article
Format: Text
Rights:
Access: Public