| Description: | This article discusses how resistance to impact criteria can lead to a tightening of the accountability noose. Vague impact criteria are a blessing in disguise. The authors write that researchers who push against criteria that allow considerable autonomy are foolish and should learn from overseas contemporaries that a clearer definition of impact requirements is not dissimilar from a tightening of the noose. |
|---|---|
| Creator(s): | |
| Creation Date: | March 15, 2012 |
| Partner(s): |
UNT College of Arts and Sciences
|
| Collection(s): |
UNT Scholarly Works
|
| Usage: |
Total Uses: 10
Past 30 days: 0
Yesterday: 0
|
| Creator (Author): |
Holbrook, J. Britt
University of North Texas |
|
|---|---|---|
| Creator (Author): |
Frodeman, Robert
University of North Texas |
|
| Publisher Info: |
Publisher Name: London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE)
Publisher Info: Public Policy Group
Place of Publication: [London, United Kingdom]
|
|
| Original Creation Date: | March 15, 2012 | |
| Description: | This article discusses how resistance to impact criteria can lead to a tightening of the accountability noose. Vague impact criteria are a blessing in disguise. The authors write that researchers who push against criteria that allow considerable autonomy are foolish and should learn from overseas contemporaries that a clearer definition of impact requirements is not dissimilar from a tightening of the noose. |
|
| Degree: |
Department:
Philosophy and Religion Studies
|
|
| Physical Description: |
3 p. |
|
| Language(s): | ||
| Subject(s): |
|
|
| Keyword(s): | impacts | peer review | autonomy | accountability | |
| Source: | Impact of Social Sciences blog, 2012 | |
| Partner: |
UNT College of Arts and Sciences
|
|
| Collection: |
UNT Scholarly Works
|
|
| Identifier: |
|
|
| Resource Type: | Article | |
| Format: | Text | |
| Rights: |
Access:
Public
|
|
