Defending Design Decisions With Usability Evidence: A Case Study

Description:

This paper discusses a case study on defending design decisions with usability evidence.

Creator(s): Friess, Erin
Creation Date: 2008  
Partner(s):
UNT College of Arts and Sciences
Collection(s):
UNT Scholarly Works
Usage:
Total Uses: 217
Past 30 days: 1
Yesterday: 0
Creator (Author):
Friess, Erin

University of North Texas

Publisher Info:
Place of Publication: [New York, New York]
Date(s):
  • Creation: 2008
Description:

This paper discusses a case study on defending design decisions with usability evidence.

Degree:
Note:

Abstract: This case study takes a close look at what novice designers discursively use as evidence to support design decisions. User-centered design has suggested that all design decisions should be made with the concern for the user at the forefront, and, ideally, this concern should be represented by findings discovered within user-centered research. However, the data from a 12-month longitudinal study suggests that although these novice designers are well versed with user-centered design theory, in practice they routinely do not use user-centered research findings to defend their design decisions. Instead these novice designers use less definitive and more designer-centered forms of evidence. This move away from the user, though perhaps unintentional, may suggest that design pedagogy may need to be re-evaluated to ensure that novice designers continue to adhere to the implications of user-centered research throughout the design process.

Physical Description:

8 p.

Language(s):
Subject(s):
Keyword(s): user-centered designs | design pedagogy | discourse analyses | decision-making practices | user interfaces
Source: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), 2008, Florence, Italy
Contributor(s):
Partner:
UNT College of Arts and Sciences
Collection:
UNT Scholarly Works
Identifier:
  • ARK: ark:/67531/metadc38900
Resource Type: Paper
Format: Text
Rights:
Access: Public