FCC Record, Volume 2, No. 1, Pages 1 to 409, January 5 - January 16, 1987 Page: 174
iii, 409, v p. ; 28 cm.View a full description of this book.
Extracted Text
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
FCC 86-529 Federal Communications Commission Record
II U Ir 1_ .L. IIII II I r . I I II
i iii I . I I I I I ,, I .I I II Il i I,1 I. . I l
324 BellSouth's ex parte presentation of October 24, 1986 to
the Chief of the Common Carrier Bureau and its staff.
325 Id. at 28.
326 Id.
327 BellSouth's Comments included an accounting plan that
addressed more types of joint and common costs than are
implicated by its limited joint marketing proposal. BellSouth
Comments at 26 n. 15; BellSouth Reply Comments at App. L.
In its Reply Comments, BellSouth substantially narrowed the
applicability of its accounting plan in a narrative fashion; and it
subsequently submitted a revised accounting plan specifically
limited to the costs affected by its joint marketing proposal as
described in its Comments and Reply Comments.
328 BellSouth argues that when one sales person merges the
network services and CPE proposals into a unified proposal,
both organizations benefit equally. Accordingly, BellSouth proposes
that the costs of merging the proposals, which it asserts
will be relatively quite small, will be split equally. When a sales
person acts as a single point of contact, if the customer contact
involves both network serves and CPE activities, the time will
be equally divided; if it involves only one category, the total
time will be charged to that activity.
324 Ameritech Reply Comments at 18-19.
33' Id. at 19.
331 Id.
332 NYNEX Reply Comments at 14-15.
333 Id. at 14.
334 NATA Reply Comments at 64-65; IDCMA Reply Comments
at 53.
,35 See IDCMA Reply Comments at 53; NTIA Comments at 9.
336 IDCMA Reply Comments at 54; NTIA Comments at 11.
337 NATA Reply Comments at 64 n. 43.
338 To the extent that a BOC previously has filed with this
Commission detailed explanations of the practices and procedures
on which it plans to rely to implement our nonstructural
safeguards, it need not duplicate information still applicable in
its compliance plans. It may instead specifically cross-reference
the earlier filings and provide any updated information necessary
to describe fully how it plans to use those practices and
procedures to implement the nonstructural safeguards.
339 See supra para. 138.
340 See supr a note 327.
341 See supra para. 90.
342 See supra para. 137.
343 In order to expedite the review process, we delegate to the
Chief of the Common Carrier Bureau the authority to review,
and approve or reject, any such petitions.
344 We wish to make clear, however, that as a condition for
such interim relief, BOCs that currently have not implemented
Sales Agency programs must either do so or must institute
some functionally equivalent program to provide a meaningful
opportunity for independent CPE vendors to joint market CPE
and BOC network services. See supra para. 94.
Upcoming Pages
Here’s what’s next.
Search Inside
This book can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Book.
United States. Federal Communications Commission. FCC Record, Volume 2, No. 1, Pages 1 to 409, January 5 - January 16, 1987, book, January 1987; Washington D.C.. (https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1597/m1/181/: accessed April 25, 2024), University of North Texas Libraries, UNT Digital Library, https://digital.library.unt.edu; crediting UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.