FCC Record, Volume 1, No. 4, Pages 549 to 785, November 10 - November 21, 1986 Page: 611
ii, 549-785, iii p. ; 28 cm.View a full description of this book.
Extracted Text
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
Federal Communications Commission Record
receive FM service of 1 mV/m or greater intensity, together
with the availability of other primary aural services
in such areas, will be considered under the standard
comparative issue for the purpose of determining whether
a comparative preference should accrue to any of the
applicants.
Contingent ComparativeApplicable
[]Inapplicable
[X]14. The respective proposals, although for different
communities, would serve substantial areas in common.
Consequently, in addition to determining, pursuant to
Section 307(b) of the Communications Act of 1934. as
amended, which of the proposals would best provide a
fair, efficient and equitable distribution of radio service, a
contingent comparative issue will also be specified.
Different Communities 307(b)Applicable
[1Inapplicable
[xl15. The respective proposals are for different communities.
Consequently, it will be necessary to determine
pursuant to Section 307(b) of the Communications Act of
1934, as amended, which of the proposals would best
provide a fair, efficient and equitable distribution of radio
services.
Air HazardApplicable
[X]Inapplicable
[I]ISSUES
Main StudioApplicable
[]Inapplicable
IX]To determine, pursuant to Section 73.1125, whether
good cause exists for the proposed location of its main
studio outside the community of license by the following
applicant(s):
City CoverageApplicable
[]Inapplicable
[X]1. To determine whether the proposal of the following
applicant(s) would provide coverage of the city sought to
be served, as required by Section 73.315(a) of the Commission's
Rules, and, if not, whether circumstances exist
which warrant waiver of that Section:
Financial QualificationsApplicable
[]Inapplicable
[XITo determine with respect to the following applicant(s)
whether, in light of the evidence adduced concerning the
deficiency set forth above in paragraph 8, the applicant(s)
is financially qualified:Air Hazard
16. Since no determination has been received from the
Federal Aviation Administration as to whether the antenna
proposed by the applicant(s) below would constitute
a hazard to air navigation, an issue with respect
thereto will be included and the F.A.A. made a party to
the proceeding.
APPLICANT(S): Bott. Redwood, Perez, Johnson, Sound
Sense
17. Except as may be indicated by any issues specified
below, the applicants are qualified to construct and operate
as proposed. Since the proposals are mutually exclusive.
they must be designated for hearing in a consolidated
proceeding on the issues specified below.
18. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, That, pursuant to
Section 309(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, the applications ARE DESIGNATED FOR
HEARING IN A CONSOLIDATED PROCEEDING, at a
time and place to be specified in a subsequent Order,
upon the following issues:Applicable
[X]Inapplicable
[]To determine whether there is a reasonable possibility
that the tower height and location proposed by the following
applicant(s) would constitute a hazard to air navi-
Upcoming Pages
Here’s what’s next.
Search Inside
This book can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Book.
United States. Federal Communications Commission. FCC Record, Volume 1, No. 4, Pages 549 to 785, November 10 - November 21, 1986, book, November 1986; Washington D.C.. (https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1580/m1/68/: accessed April 25, 2024), University of North Texas Libraries, UNT Digital Library, https://digital.library.unt.edu; crediting UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.