Knowing and acting: The precautionary and proactionary principles in relation to policy making Page: 32
23 p.View a full description of this article.
Extracted Text
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
Holbrook, J. Britt and Adam Briggle. 2013. "Knowing and acting:
The precautionary and proactionary principles in relation to policy making."
Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2 (5) 15-37.
http://wp.me/plBfg0-KQ
We prefer to put the point in more Kantian terms: acting requires autonomy. To say that
acting requires autonomy means that acting requires that we own our actions. We own
our actions by giving ourselves the principle according to which we ought to act. If
anything else determines our actions for us, we are in a condition of heteronomy. This is
why principles cannot be predetermined. Acting on the basis of predetermined principles
is not really acting - that is, acting on the basis of predetermined principles rules out the
possibility of giving ourselves the principles according to which we act (since they are
already given to us). If we know in advance of acting what we ought to do, we are
determined by that knowledge, and therefore we are not autonomous. Autonomy- acting
on our own- requires that we not know ahead of time how we ought to act. Knowledge
kills action in the sense that predetermination of principles kills autonomy.
Contact details: Britt.Holbrook@unt.edu, Adam.Briggle@unt.edu
References
Beauchamp, Tom and James Childress. 1979. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 1st ed.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bozeman, Barry, and Craig Boardman. 2009. "Broad Impacts and Narrow Perspectives:
Passing the Buck on Science and Social Impacts." Social Epistemology 23 (3-4):
183-198.
Briggle, Adam, Robert Frodeman, and J. Britt Holbrook. 2006. "Introducing a Policy
Turn in Environmental Philosophy." Environmental Philosophy 3 (1): 70-77.
Briggle, Adam. 2009. "The Kass Council and the Politicization of Ethics Advice," Social
Studies ofScience 39 (2): 309-326.
Briggle, Adam. 2013. "Let Politics, Not Science Decide the Fate of Fracking," Slate,
March 12.
http://www.slate.com/blogs/future-tense/2013/03/12/frackingbansletpoliticsn
ot science decide.html.
Brown, Mark. 2009. Science in Democracy. Expertise, Institutions, and Representation.
Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.
Callahan, Daniel. 1973. "Bioethics as a Discipline," Hasting Center Studies 1: 66-73.
Clouser, K. Danner and Bernard Gert. 1990. "A Critique of Principlism." The Journal of
Medicine and Philosophy 15: 219-236.
Collins, H.M., and Robert Evans. 2002. "The Third Wave of Science Studies: Studies of
Expertise and Experience." Social Studies of Science 32 (2): 235-296.32
Upcoming Pages
Here’s what’s next.
Search Inside
This article can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Article.
Holbrook, J. Britt & Briggle, Adam. Knowing and acting: The precautionary and proactionary principles in relation to policy making, article, 2013; (https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc157308/m1/18/: accessed April 24, 2024), University of North Texas Libraries, UNT Digital Library, https://digital.library.unt.edu; crediting UNT College of Arts and Sciences.