Abstracts of Current Decisions on Mines and Mining: May to August, 1919 Page: XII
xxii, 167 p.View a full description of this report.
Extracted Text
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
CONTENTS.
Mines and mining operations________--------------------__
Actions-Pleading and proof of negligence__ _ -__
Recovery must follow allegations of negligence_
Relation of master and servant ______ _._ _____
Admissibility of pay roll to prove relation_______
Employment by common employment agent____-
Oversight retained by operator-________-_ - _ __
Deviation from employment-Effect on relation__
Burden of proof ---------
Lease of mine without change of possession_
Negligence of operator ____________
Question of fact-------------------------------
Proof sufficient-Violation of duty
Violation of duty-Probable results__________Page.
)494
94
-- -- 94
94
94
95
95
96
96
-------------
96
96
-- -- 97Injuries reasonably anticipated ------------------- ---
Failure to inspect after blast-Question of fact - - -
Intervening agency-----------------------
Appliances maintained by operator-Proof and presumption ...
Unsafe appliance-Operator's knowledge-Liability ------------
Knowledge of unsafe condition Roof of mine ------- --
Failure to make breakthroughs-Liability_---------
Construction of bathhouse-Insufficient proof--------------
Gas company maintaining broken pipe_
Miners riding on loaded cars-Duty owing-Proof of custom___
Insufficient propping_________-----
Instruction-Timber " too near the rail "-
Duty of operator to furnish safe place_
Nondelegable duty---------------------- ----------------
Inspection-Sufficiency and presumption - --
Breach of duty-Pleading ------
Remote contingency-------------
Duty of operator to provide safe appliances-------------------
Failure to supply-Knowledge of defects-Failure to inspect---,
Defective appliances-Burden of proof----------------------
Exercise of care-Employer not insurer...................
Duty of operator to warn or instruct _ -----------
Liability for failure to warn------------------------
Inexperienced miner-Insufficient warning-------- -
Hazardous undertaking-Employer's knowledge of danger --
Duty of operator to promulgate rules_.
Construction and application of rule .
Rules abrogated or waived_ _____--------------
Customary violation-Effect-- --------.
Duty of operator to furnish first aid -__-------
Duty and care required--------- --------------
Miner's working place--Safe place_-----------------------
Main entry-Relative duty of miner and operator- Question of
fact----------------- -----------------------------
Instruction as to duty of miner ------------------
Operator's assurance of safety-Reliance----- ---------
Miner's knowledge of danger-Reliance upon orders of employer_97
97
97
97
98
98
98
99
99
99
100
100
101
101
101
101
101
102
102
102
102
103
103
103
104
104
104
104
105
105
105
105
105
106
106
106XII
Upcoming Pages
Here’s what’s next.
Search Inside
This report can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Report.
Thompson, J. W. Abstracts of Current Decisions on Mines and Mining: May to August, 1919, report, 1920; Washington D.C.. (https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc12376/m1/12/: accessed April 25, 2024), University of North Texas Libraries, UNT Digital Library, https://digital.library.unt.edu; crediting UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.