Classifying genes to the correct Gene Ontology Slim term in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using neighbouring genes with classification learning Page: 9
9 p.View a full description of this article.
Extracted Text
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
Amthauer and Tsatsoulis BMC Genomics 2010, 11:340
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/11/3404. Gene Ontology Consortium: Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of
biology. Nature Genetics 2000, 25:25-29.
5. Blumenthal T: Gene clusters and polycistronic transcription in eukaryotes.
BioEssays 1998, 20:480-487.
6. Boutanaev AM, Kalmykova Al, Shevelyov YY, Nurminsky DI: Large clusters
of co-expressed genes in the Drosophila genome. Nature 2002,
420(6916):666-9.
7. Caron H, van Schaik B, Mee van der M, Baas F, Riggins G, van Sluis P,
Hermus MC, van Asperen R, Boon K, Voute PA, Heisterkamp S, van
Kampen A, Versteeg R: The human transcriptome map: Clustering of
highly expressed genes in chromosomal domains. Science 2001,
291:1289-1292.
8. Cohen BA, Mitra RD, Hughes JD, Church GM: A computational analysis of
whole-genome expression data reveals chromosomal domains of gene
expression. Nature Genet 2000, 26:183-186.
9. Lee JM, Sonnhammer ELL: Genomic Gene Clustering Analysis of
Pathways in Eukaryotes. Genome Research 2003, 13:875-882.
10. Lercher MJ, Urrutia AO, Hurst LD: Clustering of housekeeping genes
provides a unified model of gene order in the human genome. Nat
Genet 2002, 31:180-183.
11. Li Q, Lee BTK, Zhang L: Genome-scale analysis of positional clustering of
mouse testis-specific genes. BMC Genomics 2005, 6:7.
12. Mayor LR, Fleming KP, Muller A, Balding DJ, Sternberg MJE: Clustering of
Protein Domains in the Human Genome. J Mol Biol 2004, 340:991-1004.
13. Roy PJ, Stuart JM, Lund J, Kim SK: Chromosomal clustering of muscle-
expressed genes in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 2002, 418:975-979.
14. Spellman PT, Rubin GM: Evidence for large domains of similarly
expressed genes in the Drosophila genome. J Biol 2002, 1:5.
15. Dandekar TS, Snel B, Huynen M, Bork P: Conservation of gene order: a
fingerprint of proteins that physically interact. Trends Biochem Sci 1998,
23:324-328.
16. Frishman D, Mironov A, Mewes H-W, Gelfand M: Combining diverse
evidence for gene recognition in completely sequenced bacterial
genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 1998, 26:2941-2947.
17. Galperin MY, Koonin EV: Who's your neighbor? New computational
approaches for functional genomics. Nature Biotechnology 2000,
18:609-613.
18. Jensen LJ, Gupta R, Staerfeldt H, Brunak S: Prediction of human protein
function according to Gene Ontology categories. Bioinformatics 2003,
19:635-642.
19. Yanai I, Mellor JC, DeLisi C: Identifying functional links between genes
using conserved chromosomal proximity. Trends in Genetics 2002,
18:176-179.
20. Fukuoka Y, Inaoka H, Kohane IS: Inter-species differences of co-expression
of neighboring genes in eukaryotic genomes. BMC Genomics 2004, 5:4.
21. Witten IH, Frank E: Data Mining: Practical machine learning tools and
techniques San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann, 2 2005.
22. Webb GI: MultiBoosting: A Technique for Combining Boosting and
Wagging. Machine Learning Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000,
40(2):159-196.
23. Quinlan JR: C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning San Mateo, CA: Morgan
Kauffman 1993.
24. Freund Y, Schapire RE: Experiments with a new boosting algorithm.
Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Machine Learning
Bari, Italy: Morgan Kaufmann 1996, 148-156.
25. Bauer E, Kohavi R: An empirical comparison of voting classification
algorithms: Bagging, boosting, and variants. Machine Learning 1998,
36:105-139.
26. Shannon CE, Weaver W: A Mathematical Model of Communication Urbana,
IL: University of Illinois Press 1949.
27. Pal C, Hurst LD: Evidence for co-evolution of gene order and
recombination rate. Nature Genet 2003, 33:392-395.
28. Kruglyak S, Tang H: Regulation of adjacent yeast genes. Trends in Genetics
2000, 16:109-111.
29. SGD project: "Saccharomyces Genome Database". 2008 [ftp://ftp.
yeastgenome.org/yeast/].
doi:l 0.1186/1471-2164-11-340
Cite this article as: Amthauer and Tsatsoulis: Classifying genes to the
correct Gene Ontology Slim term in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using
neighbouring genes with classification learning. BMIC Genomics 2010
11:340.Submit your next manuscript to BioMed Central
and take full advantage of:
* Convenient online submission
* Thorough peer review
* No space constraints or color figure charges
* Immediate publication on acceptance
* Inclusion in PubMed, CAS, Scopus and Google Scholar
* Research which is freely available for redistribution
Submit your manuscript atent
www.biomedcentral.com/submit Bio ed CentralPage 9 of 9
Search Inside
This article can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Article.
Amthauer, Heather A. & Tsatsoulis, C. (Costas), 1962-. Classifying genes to the correct Gene Ontology Slim term in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using neighbouring genes with classification learning, article, May 28, 2010; [London, United Kingdom]. (https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc122144/m1/9/: accessed April 18, 2024), University of North Texas Libraries, UNT Digital Library, https://digital.library.unt.edu; crediting UNT College of Engineering.